Skip to content
All field trails
FIELD TRAIL · Algorithms & complexity

Where quantum speedups come from

Search, factoring and the complexity questions behind advantage. Four sourced contributions to read in sequence.

0 of 4 contribution links opened · stored on this device
  1. STOP 1 OF 4 · Search an unstructured space

    Lov K. Grover

    1996 · A quadratic advantage for unstructured search

    Grover introduced an algorithm that finds a marked item using a number of oracle queries proportional to the square root of the search space. His STOC paper explains the constructive interference behind the result. This is a query-complexity improvement for a specified search problem, not a claim that every database workload becomes faster.

    Sole author of the original quantum-search algorithm paper.

    Read the contribution in context
  2. STOP 2 OF 4 · Use mathematical structure

    Peter W. Shor

    1994 · Factoring and discrete logarithms in polynomial time

    Shor presented quantum algorithms whose runtime scales polynomially for integer factoring and discrete logarithms. The result concerns an ideal quantum computational model and does not imply that contemporary devices can break deployed cryptographic keys.

    Originator and sole author of the cited factoring and discrete-logarithm paper.

    Read the contribution in context
  3. STOP 3 OF 4 · Take a quantum walk

    Andrew M. Childs

    2003 · A quantum-walk exponential separation

    Childs and five coauthors constructed a graph-traversal problem in an oracle model that a continuous-time quantum walk solves exponentially faster than classical algorithms can. The model and input-access assumptions are essential to interpreting this theoretical speedup.

    Coauthored theoretical result by Andrew M. Childs, Richard Cleve, Enrico Deotto, Edward Farhi, Sam Gutmann and Daniel A. Spielman.

    Read the contribution in context
  4. STOP 4 OF 4 · Examine the assumptions

    Scott Aaronson

    2010 · The complexity case for boson sampling

    With Alex Arkhipov, Aaronson analyzed sampling from linear-optical circuits and gave complexity-theoretic reasons that efficient classical simulation would have unlikely consequences. The paper helped define an experimental route to testing quantum computational advantage without requiring a universal programmable quantum computer.

    Joint theoretical work by Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov; the hardness conclusions depend on stated complexity assumptions.

    Read the contribution in context

Keep following the evidence.

This trail selects starting points from the current edition. Each profile gives fuller context, collaborators and limitations.

Choose another trail