Skip to content
Back to people
Scott Aaronson
QUBITWIRE 100

Scott Aaronson

Professor of Computer Science and director of the Quantum Information Center

University of Texas at Austin

Scott Aaronson / UT Austin
United States · work baseIdentification checked 2026-09-19

Photo: Scott Aaronson retouched.jpgEasy n; retouching by Dcoetzee. Public domain (author dedication). Cropped to fit the display frame.

WHY INCLUDED

Aaronson investigates the limits of quantum computation, connecting complexity theory with experiments designed to test when quantum devices can outperform classical simulation.

Scott Aaronson / UT AustinarXivarXiv

Aaronson supplies a mathematical lens for deciding what a quantum experiment demonstrates. His work with Alex Arkhipov made sampling from linear-optical networks a central example of a restricted quantum task with potentially prohibitive classical cost. His postselection theorem links a modified quantum model to a classical complexity class, helping separate physical computation from stronger hypothetical resources. Together, these results give researchers precise questions to ask about advantage, assumptions and verification. His inclusion reflects these identifiable theoretical contributions rather than a claim that every proposed quantum speedup is established.

Scott Aaronson / UT AustinarXivarXiv

Defining contributions

Work, in context
  1. 2004

    Relating postselection to counting complexity

    Aaronson proved that quantum computation with postselection characterizes the classical complexity class PP. The result concerns a mathematical computational model in which selected measurement outcomes can be conditioned on; it does not make postselection freely available in a laboratory.

    Sole-author theoretical result by Scott Aaronson; the theorem concerns the postselection model.

    Source-supported recordarXiv
  2. 2010

    The complexity case for boson sampling

    With Alex Arkhipov, Aaronson analyzed sampling from linear-optical circuits and gave complexity-theoretic reasons that efficient classical simulation would have unlikely consequences. The paper helped define an experimental route to testing quantum computational advantage without requiring a universal programmable quantum computer.

    Joint theoretical work by Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov; the hardness conclusions depend on stated complexity assumptions.

    Source-supported recordarXiv

Keep in perspective

Timeline dates identify first preprint publication. Complexity assumptions are not experimental proof of an unrestricted speedup.

Follow the evidence

3 sources

Primary papers, institutional records and attributed announcements. Each source supports the claims linked above.

QubitWire editorial · Content edition 2026-09-19.1Independent coverage. Inclusion does not imply endorsement.