Q-CTRL: what changed.
The recorded research and its supporting evidence.
This is a historical record. Read the current company research →Evidence or assessment clarified · axis ratings unchanged
Assessment reviewed 6 Sept 2026 · Research reviewed 7 Sept 2026What changed
- Research evidence: Experimental benchmarking of an automated deterministic error suppression workflow for quantum algorithms
- Previously
Experimental study, subsequently published in Physical Review Applied, reports a multi-algorithm benchmark suite on IBM hardware with up to 16 qubits. The arXiv page links the journal article.
- Source title
- Experimental benchmarking of an automated deterministic error suppression workflow for quantum algorithms
- Source publication date
- 14 Sept 2022
- Source type
- paper
- Marked independent
- Not recorded
- Now
Experimental study, subsequently published in Physical Review Applied, reports a multi-algorithm benchmark suite on IBM hardware with up to 16 qubits. The arXiv page links the journal article.
- Source title
- Experimental benchmarking of an automated deterministic error suppression workflow for quantum algorithms
- Source publication date
- 14 Sept 2022
- Source type
- paper
- Marked independent
- Not recorded
- Where to look
- Abstract; submission history
- Source checked
- 12 Nov 2026
- Source or product version
- arXiv:2209.06864v2, 3 May 2023
- Limitations
- Vendor-authored benchmark, specified algorithms and IBM devices up to 16 qubits.
- Retained for this claim (1)
- Research evidence: Improve quantum workload performance with Q CTRL’s Fire Opal error suppression for Ion Q processors on Amazon Braket
- Previously
Joint AWS, Q-CTRL and IonQ technical article provides performance comparisons and integration code. It is partner-authored evidence, not independent replication.
- Source title
- Improve quantum workload performance with Q-CTRL’s Fire Opal error suppression for IonQ processors on Amazon Braket
- Source publication date
- 11 Mar 2025
- Source type
- technical
- Marked independent
- Not recorded
- Now
Joint AWS, Q-CTRL and IonQ technical article provides performance comparisons and integration code. It is partner-authored evidence, not independent replication.
- Source title
- Improve quantum workload performance with Q-CTRL’s Fire Opal error suppression for IonQ processors on Amazon Braket
- Source publication date
- 11 Mar 2025
- Source type
- technical
- Marked independent
- Not recorded
- Where to look
- Table 1; Getting started steps 1–4; author affiliations
- Source checked
- 12 Nov 2026
- Source or product version
- AWS/Q-CTRL/IonQ article, 11 March 2025
- Limitations
- Partner benchmarks on Forte; 1.06–2.43 error-reduction factors are task/baseline-specific, not universal speedups.
- Retained for this claim (1)
Sources used in this record (5)
- Experimental benchmarking of an automated deterministic error suppression workflow for quantum algorithms ↗
- Performance Management — A Qiskit Function by Q-CTRL Fire Opal ↗
- Improve quantum workload performance with Q-CTRL’s Fire Opal error suppression for IonQ processors on Amazon Braket ↗
- IonQ and Q-CTRL Partner to Unlock Quantum Optimization with Fire Opal on Forte Quantum Processors ↗
- Q-CTRL integrates Fire Opal with RIKEN's IBM Quantum System Two ↗
Recorded dates use UTC and show when QubitWire saved the comparison. Review dates show the evidence check; neither is a new claim about when the underlying event happened. This view preserves the original research and assessment methodology.