Skip to content
HARDWARE · MODULAR COMPUTING

IBM tests four quantum links between two Nighthawk chips

An October 21 preprint separates state-transfer fidelity from the harder task of operating across processors.

Published Source report Sources checked
My reading list

IBM researchers report four superconducting interconnects between two 120- Nighthawk R1 processors. Only a development subset of the chips was wired and measured. Each connection includes an 80-centimeter cable installed after the modules were mounted in the refrigerator.[1]

The team reports 99% mean state-transfer fidelity under network benchmarking. Remote , which entangle qubits on separate chips, achieved a different figure: 94.75% mean fidelity. Two neighboring links also generated Bell pairs simultaneously.[1]

The unreviewed study demonstrates interconnects and cross-chip operations rather than a complete 240-qubit workload. Its assembly method addresses a practical obstacle to modular machines, while reproducibility, additional links and lower operating errors still need testing. Connecting chips becomes useful computing capacity only when the whole workload tolerates the connections it relies on.[1]

QubitWire analysis

Our assessment is that modularity moves the engineering question from the size of one chip to the reliability of the connections between chips. A useful follow-up would run a specified workload across modules and compare its result with an appropriate single-module implementation. That comparison should expose how much time is spent moving states, how failures are detected and whether the connections remain stable through repeated operation.

A reader should keep three quantities separate: the capacity printed on each processor, the qubits actually involved in the experiment and the operations completed across the link. Adding the first quantity across modules does not establish the third. Evidence about assembly and repeatability would also help explain whether the approach simplifies a larger machine or transfers complexity into its wiring, calibration and maintenance.

Keep your reading trail

Your Updates →

Evidence & context

1 linked source

Preprint · source published 2026-10-21. Primary source checked October 27, 2026.

How to read the evidence and dates

An announcement records what an organization stated. An experiment reports an observation. A simulation or resource estimate depends on its assumptions. QubitWire’s analysis connects these sources; the labels are not quality scores.

Published is the article’s first QubitWire publication. Updated marks a substantive content change. Sources checked records a review of the underlying evidence. An older paper can support a new explanation, and another press release about the same work is not independent replication.

Sources

  1. Meter-scale quantum interconnects between large quantum processors

    Direct full primary preprint v1, abstract, assembly description, four-link benchmark and remote CZ sections reviewed. IBM company blog inaccessible; no October 27 same-day announcement claim included.

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Hardware stories
  1. Explore modular systems

    A Neural Decoder Learned More Quantum Tasks. Can It Keep Up With the Hardware?

    An October 2 preprint reports modular neural decoding of IBM memory and lattice-surgery experiments. Reusing the architecture reduces redesign, but live processing speed remains unmeasured.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
  2. Explore modular systems

    IBM Demonstrates Two Connected Modular Cryogenic Cells

    Box-shaped cryostats offer shorter interconnect paths and more wiring room for future multi-processor quantum systems.

    Source report
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Read the latest edition.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read the on-site briefing →

Read selected quantum coverage in the on-site briefing, or register your interest below.