Skip to content
HARDWARE · WHOLE-CHIP ENTANGLEMENT

IQM reports entanglement across its full 54-qubit chip

A whole-chip benchmark asks how much hardware can work together. Its readout treatment remains part of the result.

Published Source report Sources checked
My reading list
A cleanroom technician in protective clothing working at laboratory equipment.
A technician working in an IQM cleanroom. Company media photograph used as context; the photograph is not identified as the Emerald device or the reported benchmark run.Inside an IQM cleanroom. IQM Quantum Computers · IQM press-library permission for articles and media coverage. Proportionally resized and converted to WebP. Full available composition retained; no crop, retouching or generated elements. IQM Quantum Computers · IQM press-library permission for articles and media coverage · IQM press-library permission for articles and media coverageFull image credit

IQM says its Emerald processor has produced a GHZ state across all 54 . Its October 29 announcement reports fidelity of 0.516 after readout error mitigation. A separate 40-qubit result reached 0.515 without that treatment. Both reported point estimates exceed the 0.500 threshold used in the reported test. The company says the improved system performance is available through its cloud platform.[1]

The result addresses an intuitive question about a quantum processor: how much of the chip can participate in one coordinated experiment? Counting the components gives one answer about a machine. Testing a state that spans those components asks a different question about their collective behavior.

The two reported fidelities should not become a league table. They come from different system sizes and different treatment of the measurements. Readout mitigation adjusts estimated measurement results using an error model; the qualification is part of the evidence, even when the result is shortened for a card or shared headline.

IQM's September software documentation describes joint optimization of the selected qubits, preparation tree and gate order. That is useful background for how such tests can be arranged, but it does not independently verify the October measurement or identify the exact routine used in it.[2]

The next useful evidence would establish how repeatable the result is, how its uncertainty compares with the threshold and how much work a user needs to reproduce it. A whole-chip state test is meaningful within that scope. It does not establish that arbitrary programs can use every qubit equally well or that a useful computational advantage has been reached.

Keep your reading trail

Your Updates →

Evidence & context

2 linked sources

Company-reported hardware benchmark

How to read the evidence and dates

An announcement records what an organization stated. An experiment reports an observation. A simulation or resource estimate depends on its assumptions. QubitWire’s analysis connects these sources; the labels are not quality scores.

Published is the article’s first QubitWire publication. Updated marks a substantive content change. Sources checked records a review of the underlying evidence. An older paper can support a new explanation, and another press release about the same work is not independent replication.

Sources

  1. IQM demonstrates entanglement across a complete 54-qubit processor

    Primary source checked October 29, 2026.

  2. IQM Benchmarks changelog, version 3.0.0

    Primary source checked October 29, 2026.

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Hardware stories
  1. Related reading

    The same quantum program can become a different physical experiment

    A cross-provider study shows why placement, compilation and measurement definitions belong beside execution comparisons.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Read the latest edition.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read the on-site briefing →

Read selected quantum coverage in the on-site briefing, or register your interest below.