Skip to content
QubitWire
COMPANY RESEARCH · Computing hardware

IQM Quantum Computers

Uses controlled superconducting circuits to execute gates, delivered through cloud services and installed systems.

Official website ↗IQM Quantum Computers market context (NASDAQ:IQMX) →
Finland / Germany · Research reviewed 7 Sept 2026

Initial record: initial assessment recorded.

Review history 1 record

Record dates use UTC and show when an assessment or clarification was saved. Review dates show the evidence check. Earlier records were recovered from QubitWire’s source history; no earlier score movement is inferred.

Identity & attribution
Organization record
IQM Quantum Computers (organization-015)
Recorded role
Superconducting gate-model systems and cloud access
Recorded aliases
No aliases recorded in this assessment.
Name and period
No dated name or ownership transition is recorded here. An alias is a search aid, not evidence of a legal ownership relationship.
Product scope
Superconducting gate-model quantum computers

A company profile may discuss several systems. Capabilities remain attached to the product and conditions named in each source; they do not transfer automatically to related organizations. A verified security relationship has not been attached to this record.

Report an identity issue →

Evidence updates

New evidence to consider

These source updates add context. QRank scores retain their existing assessment dates.

IQM · Purchase agreement; delivery planned

IQM announced an Eldorado Research Institute purchase agreement for an IQM Spark in Campinas, Brazil, with installation planned for Q1 2027. The agreement also includes access to a 54-qubit system in Europe through the cloud.

Source checked
Limits, research question & sources

Local hardware delivery and remote cloud access are separate milestones. A handover has not been established by this announcement.

Question to follow: Does the profile separate purchased capacity, delivery schedule and operational availability?

Company evidence and analysis

Dated company evidence, its limits and the next test to follow. These notes do not change a QRank score.

IQMSuperconducting quantum systems

Sources reviewed 20 Oct 2026. Event dates remain attached to the original evidence.

IQM Quantum Computers began Nasdaq trading through American depositary shares under IQMX in July 2026. The completed listing is a corporate milestone. It does not change the evidence required to assess the performance, delivery or usability of an IQM quantum system.

For an installed hardware business, the most useful profile follows the customer site. A system can be ordered, shipped, assembled, commissioned and accepted on different dates. An investor announcement may mention several stages together, while the researcher using the equipment cares about stable access and the range of experiments that can actually run. IQM’s directory evidence should therefore join an identified system configuration to an identified acceptance stage, avoiding a running total that counts commitments as deployments. Public-market coverage also needs the correct security identity: the issuer, the depositary receipt and an ordinary share should not become separate companies in a sector map. An updated card can link the corporate record and technical record while preserving their independence. The strongest future comparison is sustained customer usage at a documented specification, supported by the customer as well as the supplier.

For a reader evaluating IQM, the practical question is whether a delivered installation offers reproducible access and support beyond the acceptance demonstration. A useful next evidence check is specific: track installation date, acceptance protocol, available calibration data, uptime definition and repeat customer workload. A large device specification does not describe scheduling access, maintenance time or usable circuit performance. These are proposed tests for judging a later update, not claims that the company has already passed them.

Security status: Verified listed parent or issuer; see security record

Facts, comparisons and next evidence

At a glance

  • label
    Quantum role
    value
    Integrated superconducting systems
  • label
    Evidence date
    value
    2026-07-02
  • label
    Assessment action
    value
    Evidence enrichment

Dated milestones

  • date
    2026-07-02
    Date scope
    source publication date; unknown if undated
    event
    ADS listing commenced
    status
    Published primary evidence; retain the narrower maturity statement
    what it does not establish
    A large device specification does not describe scheduling access, maintenance time or usable circuit performance.

Quantum role

layer
Integrated superconducting systems
Question
Whether a delivered installation offers reproducible access and support beyond the acceptance demonstration.

Questions for comparison

  • Customer-site commissioning and acceptance
  • Usable configuration and access restrictions
  • Issuer versus depositary-receipt identity

Related approaches

  • name
    QuantWare
    relationship
    Proposed comparison of relevant dimensions; not a claim of equivalent products or a ranking
    dimensions
    • Customer-site commissioning and acceptance
    • Usable configuration and access restrictions
    • Issuer versus depositary-receipt identity
  • name
    Equal1
    relationship
    Proposed comparison of relevant dimensions; not a claim of equivalent products or a ranking
    dimensions
    • Customer-site commissioning and acceptance
    • Usable configuration and access restrictions
    • Issuer versus depositary-receipt identity

Limits and missing evidence

  • A large device specification does not describe scheduling access, maintenance time or usable circuit performance.
  • Latest customer acceptance documents
  • Sustained uptime and supported workloads
  • Depositary agreement before share-ratio calculations

What would change this assessment

trigger
Track installation date, acceptance protocol, available calibration data, uptime definition and repeat customer workload.
Evidence needed
Dated primary technical report, product specification or customer/issuer disclosure directly answering the test.
Test
Identify the configuration, time boundary and measured outcome; retain unsuccessful attempts and stated limitations.
Limit
A large device specification does not describe scheduling access, maintenance time or usable circuit performance.

A starting question

question
What does an ADS represent in a quantum-company directory?
answer
It is a security structure linked to shares in an issuer, not another quantum company. Keep one organization record and attach separately verified listings and security classes to it.
Original sources and scope
  1. IQM Quantum Computers begins trading on Nasdaq ↗Source dated 1 Jul 2026

    The July 1 completion release specifies trading from July 2 and one ordinary share per ADS. Shares, ADSs and warrants remain distinct instruments.

IQMExisting listed issuer

Sources reviewed 20 Oct 2026. Event dates remain attached to the original evidence.

Announced or reported: IQM’s completed Nasdaq listing uses American depositary shares under IQMX.

Still conditional: No unverified ADS-to-ordinary-share ratio, second listing or live share count is supplied here.

IQM needs one company record with separately identified securities. An American depositary share should not create an additional quantum company in a sector total, and its quoted price should not be multiplied by an unrelated ordinary-share count. The useful update is an issuer-and-instrument mapping linked to the depositary agreement and the latest filing. On the operating side, system sales should be dated by order, shipment, commissioning and customer acceptance, because those stages can differ materially. Combining clean security identity with clean delivery identity gives readers a more meaningful view of exposure. The next evidence should establish the correct conversion ratio and share-count date before any market-capitalization calculation, then connect current commercial reporting to accepted installations. Public trading is a financing milestone; it remains separate from proving the performance of a system installed at a customer site.

Map the quoted ADS to its issuer and underlying security before aggregating capitalization. The concrete next evidence is: issuer/depositary documentation of the ratio, corporate actions and outstanding security counts. A symbol identifies a security; multiple instruments or venues cannot simply be added as independent companies. This watch record should change when that evidence changes, with the original event and reporting period preserved so readers can distinguish a new outcome from a refreshed page.

Facts, comparisons and next evidence

At a glance

  • label
    Commercial evidence stage
    value
    Listed security mechanics
  • label
    Catalyst date
    value
    2026-07-02
  • label
    Security treatment
    value
    Nasdaq: IQMX

Dated milestones

  • date
    2026-07-02
    event
    Listed security structure and deployment reporting
    status
    Listed security mechanics
    Remaining condition
    See this card’s remaining-condition panel for the complete unresolved scope.

Cash and revenue boundary

Question
Map the quoted ADS to its issuer and underlying security before aggregating capitalization.
risk
A symbol identifies a security; multiple instruments or venues cannot simply be added as independent companies.
realized or announced
See this card’s announced-fact panel; the complete source-backed state is recorded there once.
still conditional
See this card’s remaining-condition panel; keep its qualifications attached to the fact.

What would change this assessment

Evidence needed
Issuer/depositary documentation of the ratio, corporate actions and outstanding security counts.
Test
Map the quoted ADS to its issuer and underlying security before aggregating capitalization.
Limit
A symbol identifies a security; multiple instruments or venues cannot simply be added as independent companies.

Basis for comparison

dimensions
  • ADS ratio
  • underlying shares
  • issuer identity
rule
Compare the same period, currency, instrument or contract status. Unknown values stay blank; no cross-company score is supplied.

Limits and missing evidence

  • A symbol identifies a security; multiple instruments or venues cannot simply be added as independent companies.
  • Are multiple securities double counted as issuers?
  • Does any capitalization calculation mix different instruments?

Measures to follow

  • Verified issuer/instrument/venue mapping
  • Accepted systems versus orders
  • Cash use and customer delivery obligations

Documents still needed

  • Depositary agreement and conversion ratio
  • Latest issuer share-count disclosure
  • Customer-specific commissioning/acceptance stages
Original sources and scope
  1. IQM Quantum Computers begins trading on Nasdaq ↗Source dated 1 Jul 2026

    The July 1 completion release specifies trading from July 2 and one ordinary share per ADS. Shares, ADSs and warrants remain distinct instruments.

One quantum company can have several securitiesCompany and financial analysis

A clean watchlist distinguishes the organization, the instrument and the trading venue.

Sources reviewed 20 Oct 2026.

IQM’s July 2026 Nasdaq listing announcement identifies American depositary shares under IQMX. That is an issuer event and a security-structure fact. It should not create a second IQM in a quantum-company directory or justify a market-capitalization calculation using an unrelated share count. [1]

The SEC’s investor glossary explains that a depositary receipt can represent one or more underlying shares, or a fraction of one. The ratio matters when relating the receipt to the foreign shares. The issuer-specific depositary terms must therefore be checked before converting prices or counts; a familiar ticker is not enough. [2]

A robust record has three layers. The organization layer identifies the operating company and its technology. The issuer layer identifies the legal entity whose financial statements and ownership structure are being discussed. The security layer identifies the instrument, venue, currency and relevant identifiers. Sometimes these layers are simple. Sometimes an operating subsidiary, holding company and depositary instrument make the distinction essential.

Consider a deliberately hypothetical example in which one receipt represents several ordinary shares. Multiplying the receipt price by the number of ordinary shares would mix units. The result could look plausible while being systematically wrong. The correction is not a clever valuation adjustment; it is basic unit consistency. The same discipline applies to a chart that combines prices from different currencies or dates without saying so.

Sector counts create a second trap. Multiple listings may improve market access without creating additional businesses. Counting each ticker as a company can inflate the apparent size of the public quantum universe. A directory should therefore group verified securities under one issuer and link that issuer to the appropriate operating organizations. Acquired subsidiaries can retain technical profiles without being presented as independent public securities.

This structure also improves updates. A ticker change should update the instrument record and preserve the earlier identifier as history. A new listing should add a verified venue relationship. A merger should change the ownership map only when its status is established. None of these events should automatically rewrite the technical profile or assign a different capability score. Financing identity and hardware performance remain separate kinds of evidence.

For readers comparing businesses, the immediate benefit is clarity about what a displayed number means. Every price would need an instrument, currency and time; every share count would need a class and reporting date. This article supplies no live prices or valuation. It explains the prerequisites for calculating those figures accurately if a later analysis requires them.

A useful watchlist can make the hierarchy visible without becoming complicated. Show the company name first, then the verified issuer and its securities beneath it. Leave unverified conversion ratios blank and link the primary document needed to fill them. The result is a more trustworthy map of quantum exposure: each company appears once in the company count, while its genuine market access remains fully documented.

Original sources and scope
  1. IQM Quantum Computers begins trading on Nasdaq ↗Source dated 1 Jul 2026

    The July 1 completion release specifies trading from July 2 and one ordinary share per ADS. Shares, ADSs and warrants remain distinct instruments.

  2. American Depositary Receipts: investor glossary ↗

    General investor education; not issuer-specific depositary terms.

Read, question, follow the source

A closer look at the evidence

Company evidence guideIQM: installed-system acceptance becomes an investor questionFollow an installed quantum system from supplier delivery to customer acceptance.Context reviewed

IQM’s current evidence trail connects two activities that readers often evaluate separately: supplying superconducting quantum systems and reporting as a public company. Its July 2026 transaction documentation identifies Nasdaq American depositary shares under IQMX, with each ADS representing one IQM share. Its first public-company results cover the first half of 2026. These are useful anchors for a profile focused on how an installed system becomes an accepted customer asset. They do not make a delivery announcement equivalent to a completed technical acceptance test.

An installed-system profile should describe the boundary of the customer’s purchase. A processor, refrigerator, control electronics, software interface, maintenance agreement and training package may arrive on different schedules. The reader needs to know which components are included, who operates the machine, and what the customer can change without invalidating support. Ownership can be valuable when an institution wants to study calibration or integrate a machine into its own computing environment. It can also move operational work from the supplier to the customer. Neither consequence follows from qubit count alone.

Consider a research centre evaluating two proposals. One provides scheduled access to a supplier-operated service; the other installs equipment locally. The local machine could improve experimental control while requiring staffing, facilities and planned downtime. A useful comparison would hold the research programme constant and compare completed experiments over a stated period, access to calibration records, recovery from failed runs, and the ability to reproduce a result after maintenance. Purchase price would be only one input. This is an editorial comparison framework, not a report of an IQM customer contract.

The same boundary helps interpret financial reporting. An order, a backlog entry, a shipment, customer acceptance and recognised revenue describe different stages of a commercial relationship. Their definitions belong beside the numbers. A change in backlog may reflect new commitments, delivery progress, cancellations, currency movements or another disclosed adjustment. Readers should not be asked to infer the cause from a single total. An evidence card can instead connect the reporting period to management’s definition and the relevant customer or deployment document, while marking any unreported acceptance conditions as unknown.

Issuer
IQM Quantum Computers Plc
Public exposure
Direct quantum hardware issuer
Exchange
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Ticker
IQMX
Traded instrument
American depositary shares, each representing one IQM share
Evidence boundary
Delivery, acceptance, support and recognised revenue are distinct milestones
Acceptance terms
Not verified for any individual customer contract

Questions to take with you

What does the ADS label change?

It identifies the traded instrument and its relationship to the underlying shares. Readers should use that instrument when checking issuer filings or a licensed quote provider; a warrant or Helsinki share line needs its own identity and market metadata.

What would make an installation update substantive?

A customer statement about accepted performance, available access, operational responsibility or reproducible use would add information beyond a photograph or shipment date. Each claim should name the system and the conditions under which it was measured.

Evidence context only. This guide does not change QRank scores or supply a current price.

The original completion release returned HTTP 403. The same issuer release on Nasdaq confirms the US ADS identity; the results release was directly checked.

Sources and their boundaries (3)
  • IQM completes combination; ADS trading begins July 2 ↗IQM investor relations · 2026-07-01

    Completed combination; Nasdaq Global Select Market ADSs; IQMX; one share per ADS

    Warrant symbol and economics are separate; do not use the release as a live quote.

  • IQM first earnings as a public company ↗IQM investor relations · 2026-08-04 in release body

    Public-company reporting covers first half and second quarter ended June 30, 2026

    Reporting page metadata displays August 3; retain body date and do not invent acceptance milestones.

  • IQM completes combination — issuer release on Nasdaq ↗IQM via Nasdaq · 2026-07-01

    One American depositary share represents one IQM share; Nasdaq Global Select Market trading under IQMX.

    Issuer release establishes instrument identity, not a current price.

TECHNOLOGY & ACCESS

What it does. Where it fits.

Superconducting gate-model quantum computers

Who should look closer

Developers building calibrated circuits and research organizations exploring quantum integration with high-performance computing.

QubitWire’s editorial assessment of practical fit.

Cloud and installed systems

IQM’s client guide explains Resonance account access and backend calibration. VTT also offers its installed Q50 through QX; access terms depend on the provider.

Check the current access route ↗
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

What the sources establish

External researchers studied 250 days of Q-Exa operation and validated circuit performance. VTT separately reports real-time Q50 execution for a gaming demonstration.

arXiv paper · 2508.21231 ↗vttresearch.com ↗

What remains unresolved

Results on Q-Exa and VTT Q50 apply to those systems and test conditions. Calibration variation affects circuit performance; future larger-machine announcements are not treated as completed delivery.

The next question to watch

Can broader independent workload studies show reproducible improvements as system size increases, while accounting for calibration, sampling and classical processing?

A research question, not a promised milestone.

QubitWire coverage

Open research questions

Editorial questions for this profile. No reviewed closure decision has been recorded; unanswered questions do not lower the official score.

Open research question

Can broader independent workload studies show reproducible improvements as system size increases, while accounting for calibration, sampling and classical processing?

What evidence would help

A source addressing this question must identify the named system, experiment or deployment, its conditions, measured outcome and remaining limitations. Does the result report errors, circuit depth and a credible classical baseline?

What would resolve it?

An editorial review must explain which part of this question the evidence resolves. A roadmap or an announcement alone does not close it.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Which named system or service can I use under the documented access route?

What evidence would help

Check the current terms for cloud and installed systems. Identify the system version, eligibility, restrictions and whether the result used hardware or simulation.

What would resolve it?

Current primary documentation must identify the offering, eligible user and access conditions. An unspecified company-level access claim is insufficient.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Can you access the named system today, and under which plan?

What evidence would help

Provide the source location, relevant product or generation, workload, resource constraints and reported uncertainty. Keep measurements, simulations and announced targets distinct.

What would resolve it?

A source reviewer must map the evidence to this exact scope. Missing disclosure remains unknown; it is not technical failure.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence

Questions are drawn from the existing brief and sector reading guide. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. Following stores a local bookmark; it does not send email alerts or imply a scheduled review.

Since your review

Scope: IQM Quantum Computers. Reading a page never marks its records reviewed.

Keep a baseline and explicitly mark the evidence you have reviewed. This optional journal stays in this browser.

Existing material records remain available after setup. Routine rechecks and initial entries are excluded from material counts.

Public 7-day, 30-day & full history →

From claim to assessment

These are the existing assessment claims and their recorded criterion links. A source link is not an independent replication. New research does not change these published ratings automatically.

Source references in method 1.0 · assessment reviewed 7 Sept 2026
Recorded claim & sourceAssessment linkageProvenance & limits
Source 1

External LRZ, Argonne and TUM researchers analyze 250 days of Q-Exa calibration data and validate circuit performance, identifying substantial device variability.

Qubit Health Analytics and Clustering for HPC-Integrated Quantum Processors ↗Published 28 Aug 2025
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Capability

External circuit experiments and calibration analysis characterize an operating QPU, including performance variation across qubits and time.

Use in practice

External researchers used Q-Exa, and VTT reports Q50 use in a live gaming demonstration. These are documented research and demonstration uses.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.		External source; collaborators may be involved

Source type: paper. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 7 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 2

Documents Resonance authentication, circuit submission, calibration-set selection, job results and limitations on classically controlled gates. Resources include maintained client adapters and examples.

Qiskit on IQM User Guide ↗Published Not recorded
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Delivery

Maintained client documentation and a customer-operated Q50 access service establish supported hardware offerings and operational resources.

Integration

IQM maintains reusable circuit/pulse tooling, authentication, calibration and result workflows; VTT also reports implementing an application interface.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.		Organization-originated source

Source type: technical. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 7 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 3

VTT reports providing real-time Q50 hardware access and an interface for the Space Moths gaming demonstration. The report establishes actual use, not an advantage over classical game generation. VTT co-developed the Q50 with IQM; this is customer/development-partner evidence.

VTT quantum computer in Space Moths multiplayer game ↗Published 4 Sept 2025
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Use in practice

External researchers used Q-Exa, and VTT reports Q50 use in a live gaming demonstration. These are documented research and demonstration uses.

Integration

IQM maintains reusable circuit/pulse tooling, authentication, calibration and result workflows; VTT also reports implementing an application interface.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.		Organization-originated source

Source type: customer. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 7 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 4

VTT offers cloud access to its installed Q50 through the QX service, with a sales contact and tailored access arrangements. VTT co-developed the Q50 with IQM; this is customer/development-partner evidence.

Quantum computing services — VTT ↗Published Not recorded
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Delivery

Maintained client documentation and a customer-operated Q50 access service establish supported hardware offerings and operational resources.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.		Organization-originated source

Source type: customer. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 7 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 5

Documentation indexes client libraries for IQM Resonance and installed IQM systems, including circuit and pulse-level tooling.

IQM documentation ↗Published Not recorded
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Delivery

Maintained client documentation and a customer-operated Q50 access service establish supported hardware offerings and operational resources.

Integration

IQM maintains reusable circuit/pulse tooling, authentication, calibration and result workflows; VTT also reports implementing an application interface.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.		Organization-originated source

Source type: technical. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 7 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Revision and evidence-family boundaries

Record reference: d6e95ac083e85e5090edfc82568ff5672fb10dfe7dc49642dd6363daa91715d4. Read prior recorded revisions.

Repeated coverage can describe the same experiment. The assessment does not contain a reviewed claim-family grouping, so the number of links is never shown as a replication count. Source pages can change independently of this saved assessment; the original source text is not archived here.

CHECK THE ORIGINALS

Sources & evidence

  1. Qubit Health Analytics and Clustering for HPC-Integrated Quantum Processors ↗External source (may be a collaborator) · 28 Aug 2025

    External LRZ, Argonne and TUM researchers analyze 250 days of Q-Exa calibration data and validate circuit performance, identifying substantial device variability.

  2. Qiskit on IQM User Guide ↗Organization-originated source · Publication date not stated

    Documents Resonance authentication, circuit submission, calibration-set selection, job results and limitations on classically controlled gates. Resources include maintained client adapters and examples.

  3. VTT quantum computer in Space Moths multiplayer game ↗Organization-originated source · 4 Sept 2025

    VTT reports providing real-time Q50 hardware access and an interface for the Space Moths gaming demonstration. The report establishes actual use, not an advantage over classical game generation. VTT co-developed the Q50 with IQM; this is customer/development-partner evidence.

  4. Quantum computing services — VTT ↗Organization-originated source · Publication date not stated

    VTT offers cloud access to its installed Q50 through the QX service, with a sales contact and tailored access arrangements. VTT co-developed the Q50 with IQM; this is customer/development-partner evidence.

  5. IQM documentation ↗Organization-originated source · Publication date not stated

    Documentation indexes client libraries for IQM Resonance and installed IQM systems, including circuit and pulse-level tooling.

  6. IQM Quantum Computers begins trading on Nasdaq ↗Company primary announcement · 1 Jul 2026

    IQM Quantum Computers began Nasdaq trading through American depositary shares under IQMX in July 2026. The completed listing is a corporate milestone. It does not change the evidence required to assess the performance, delivery or usability of an IQM quantum system.

  7. American Depositary Receipts: investor glossary ↗U.S. SEC Investor.gov educational material · Publication date not stated

    IQM’s July 2026 Nasdaq listing announcement identifies American depositary shares under IQMX. That is an issuer event and a security-structure fact. It should not create a second IQM in a quantum-company directory or justify a market-capitalization calculation using an unrelated share count.

  8. IQM to deliver a quantum computer to Eldorado, Brazil ↗Primary source · 17 Sept 2026

    IQM announced an Eldorado Research Institute purchase agreement for an IQM Spark in Campinas, Brazil, with installation planned for Q1 2027. The agreement also includes access to a 54-qubit system in Europe through the cloud.

  9. NVIDIA expands CUDA-Q for fault-tolerant quantum computing ↗Primary source · 14 Sept 2026

    IQM announced an Eldorado Research Institute purchase agreement for an IQM Spark in Campinas, Brazil, with installation planned for Q1 2027. The agreement also includes access to a 54-qubit system in Europe through the cloud.

Keep up with the companies you follow.

Follow companies to find their published coverage here. Email alerts are not enabled.

Your updates