Skip to content
RESEARCH · EXPLAINER · QUANTUM CURIOSITIES

A Quantum Computer Made a Time Crystal. The Name Is Only Half the Fun.

Google’s qubits settled into an unusual repeating rhythm, giving researchers a new way to explore how matter behaves.

Sources checked Published
My reading list
A quantum chip photographed in the Martinis Group at UC Santa Barbara in 2010, containing a superconducting qubit coupled to a mechanical resonator. Historical superconducting-hardware context; it is not Google’s time-crystal experiment.
Photo: Erik Lucero / UCSB

A quantum chip photographed in the Martinis Group at UC Santa Barbara in 2010, containing a superconducting qubit coupled to a mechanical resonator. Historical superconducting-hardware context; it is not Google’s time-crystal experiment. Image credit“QubitMechanicalResonator” — Erik Lucero, Martinis Group, University of California, Santa Barbara. CC BY-SA 3.0. · https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

A time crystal sounds like an object you would steal in a science-fiction heist. The real version is stranger in a quieter way: a quantum system whose collective behavior repeats in time. In 2021, Google researchers and collaborators used the Sycamore processor to observe one of these unusual states.

Start with an ordinary crystal. Its atoms form a pattern that repeats across space. A discrete time crystal introduces a pattern in time, emerging in a system driven by repeating pulses. The interesting feature is a collective rhythm that stays locked to a different period from the driving rhythm.

Roughly 300 trapped beryllium ions form a spatial hexagonal crystal in a NIST experiment. This is an example of order in space, not the Google time crystal or its superconducting qubits.
Roughly 300 trapped beryllium ions form a spatial hexagonal crystal in a NIST experiment. This is an example of order in space, not the Google time crystal or its superconducting qubits. Image credit“NIST Develops Powerful Method of Suppressing Errors in Many Types of Quantum Computers (5940501143)” — National Institute of Standards and Technology. U.S. Government work / Public domain in the United States. · https://www.nist.gov/copyrights-disclaimers

In the researchers’ experiment, a chain of 20 was repeatedly driven through the same cycle. Their response repeated every two cycles and remained robust across a range of settings. That persistence mattered: merely making something oscillate would not, by itself, establish a time crystal.

This was no eternal-motion machine. The apparatus needed control pulses, and real-world noise limited the observed signal. The team used additional tests to distinguish noise from the system’s own tendency to lose order. The paper appeared online in November 2021, before its January 2022 journal issue.

The practical excitement is the experiment itself. A programmable quantum processor let scientists adjust interactions and probe an unusual phase of matter with considerable control. That is a distinctive role for quantum computing: giving researchers a laboratory for quantum behavior, even while larger, more reliable machines remain an engineering challenge.

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Research stories
  1. Follow Google

    Simulation Rankings Can Mislead Quantum Decoder Selection

    A preprint using Google Willow records separates predicting error rates from choosing error-correction software.

    Source date
  2. Follow Google

    Google Uses Error Signals to Retune Willow's Quantum Controls

    A reinforcement-learning experiment improves stability under injected drift and fine-tunes an already calibrated processor.

    Source date
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Straight to your inbox.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read a briefing preview →

Selected quantum coverage in a weekly briefing. Read the preview or register your interest.