Skip to content
RESEARCH · PROCESSOR RELIABILITY

Repeated gates leave measurable traces on neighboring qubits

An experiment examines how structured operations affect nearby spectator qubits.

Published Source report Sources checked
My reading list
An open dilution refrigerator with metallic cooling stages and wiring.
A dilution refrigerator at BBN Technologies photographed in 2009. Archival hardware context; this is not the processor measured in the repeated-gate study.Image: Dilution refrigerator at BBN Technologies, 2009.jpg · Daderot · CC0 1.0Full image credit

A study of superconducting quantum processors reports that repeated, structured two- gate sequences can influence measurement outcomes on neighboring spectator qubits. The researchers used commercially available IBM devices and compared those outcomes with control baselines.[1]

Fernando Almaguer-Angeles and colleagues describe a measurable bias on neighboring qubits that were not directly participating in the gate operation. The observations highlight how the arrangement and repetition of operations can matter alongside the performance of an isolated gate.[1]

The peer-reviewed accepted article appeared in Scientific Reports on October 21. The publisher says this early version remains subject to final edits before the Version of Record.[1]

Its authors explicitly frame IBM hardware as the experimental platform rather than making a general judgment about the company's products.[1]

The result identifies a configuration-dependent crosstalk effect. It does not establish a successful attack on another customer's information or show that all processors exhibit the same behavior. Any security implication needs to be tied to the paper's tested conditions and evidence.[1]

Keep your reading trail

Your Updates →

Evidence & context

1 linked source

Peer-reviewed accepted article released October 21, 2026; final Version of Record pending.

How to read the evidence and dates

An announcement records what an organization stated. An experiment reports an observation. A simulation or resource estimate depends on its assumptions. QubitWire’s analysis connects these sources; the labels are not quality scores.

Published is the article’s first QubitWire publication. Updated marks a substantive content change. Sources checked records a review of the underlying evidence. An older paper can support a new explanation, and another press release about the same work is not independent replication.

Sources

  1. Configuration dependent crosstalk amplification in superconducting quantum processors

    Peer-reviewed accepted experimental article shared before final Version of Record; source dated 2026-10-21. Reviewed 2026-10-27.

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Research stories
  1. Related reading

    Quantum Computers Can Make Mistakes While They Wait

    Qubits can accumulate errors while they wait. A surface-code experiment shows why the pauses between operations deserve more attention.

    Published · Sources checked
  2. Related reading

    A QEC Error Map Says Fix the 5% of Components That Hurt Most

    Tsinghua simulations rank each circuit component by its contribution to logical failure, then show targeted improvements beat the same budget spent at random.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Read the latest edition.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read the on-site briefing →

Read selected quantum coverage in the on-site briefing, or register your interest below.