Rigetti improves its quantum computer. Its annual sales target awaits customer sign-off.
New quarterly results pair an accuracy milestone with falling sales. A large Indian system order helps explain why the year-end revenue target remains conditional.
Reading tools for text size, copying, printing and your reading list
Rigetti has improved a key measure of its quantum computer’s accuracy, but its latest sales show how uneven the business remains. The company’s November 10 results report $1.4 million of third-quarter revenue, down about 28% from a year earlier, while its 108- machine reached a stated 99.5% median two-qubit .[1]
Its approximately $20 million revenue outlook for 2026 comes with an important condition: customer acceptance of a system for India’s Centre for Development of Advanced Computing, or C-DAC, and recognition of the associated revenue in the fourth quarter. Better laboratory performance and a system accepted by its customer and recorded as revenue are different milestones.[1]
The customer sign-off behind the target
Rigetti recorded $10.949 million of revenue in the first nine months, up about 110% from the same period last year. Subtracting that from its roughly $20 million annual target leaves about $9.1 million to recognize in the final quarter. That would be roughly 6.4 times the third quarter’s $1.411 million. This is QubitWire’s calculation from the report, not a separate company forecast or a prediction that the target will be met.[1]
The C-DAC order is not new: Rigetti announced it in January at $8.4 million for a 108-qubit system. The quarterly report explicitly ties the annual outlook to customer acceptance. An announced order tells readers that a customer has agreed to buy; recognized revenue tells a different part of the story about when the company can record the sale.[1][2]
For newcomers to quantum stocks, that distinction is useful beyond one company. A relatively large machine sale can dominate a small supplier’s quarter. Moving its acceptance date can shift revenue between periods without, by itself, proving that the underlying technology has succeeded or failed.
What the accuracy result means
A qubit is a quantum computer’s basic information unit. A two-qubit gate is an operation that couples two such units. Fidelity measures how closely the tested operation matches the intended one. The median is the middle value among the measured gate fidelities. Rigetti says its Cepheus-1-108Q system reached a median fidelity of 99.5%, with 99.6% on an 80-qubit subset and 99.7% on a 50-qubit subset.[1]
The subset figures are not the result for the full 108-qubit system. Nor does 99.5% gate fidelity mean that an entire calculation returns the right answer 99.5% of the time. A program can use many operations, and its outcome also depends on errors, readout and the task itself. The announcement does not demonstrate a useful application outperforming the best ordinary-computer alternative.[1]
The processor combines twelve smaller nine-qubit processor chips, called chiplets. Rigetti’s next stated objective is a system with more than 300 qubits, approximately 99.7% median two-qubit fidelity and gates below 60 nanoseconds by mid-2028. That is a development target, not a delivered product. Its longer-term ambitions should likewise be read as plans rather than present capabilities.[1]
Why the bottom line needs a second look
The company reported a $33.2 million operating loss but a much smaller $3.1 million net loss. A $25.3 million gain from revaluing warrant liabilities helped explain the gap. Warrants are rights to buy shares on specified terms; changes in their accounting value can affect reported profit without representing customer sales.[1]
Rigetti ended September with $497.1 million in cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments, and reported no debt. That combined figure is not all cash in a bank account. It provides financial context, but it is not evidence of commercial profitability or a guarantee that the technical roadmap will be achieved.[1]
The next useful checks are concrete: whether C-DAC accepts the system, how much revenue Rigetti actually records in the fourth quarter, and what independently scrutinized tests establish about the larger machine’s performance. The latest report advances the hardware story while leaving the commercial test unfinished.[1]