Skip to content
COMPANY RESEARCH · Enabling technology

Swabian Instruments

Records detection events and provides software for correlations, counting and synchronized acquisition.

Official website ↗
Germany · Research brief reviewed 23 Sept 2026

Latest record: initial assessment added.

Review history 2 records

Record dates use UTC and show when an assessment or clarification was saved. Review dates show the evidence check. Earlier records were recovered from QubitWire’s source history; no earlier score movement is inferred.

  1. Initial assessment added

    Assessment reviewed 23 Sept 2026 · Research reviewed 23 Sept 2026
    What changed
    Assessment
    Previously

    None recorded

    Now

    Initial four-axis assessment

    Sources in this record (4)
Identity & attribution
Organization record
Swabian Instruments (organization-178)
Recorded role
Photon timing and time-tagging instrumentation
Recorded aliases
No aliases recorded in this assessment.
Name and period
No dated name or ownership transition is recorded here. An alias is a search aid, not evidence of a legal ownership relationship.
Product scope
Time-tagging electronics for photon counting and digital-signal measurements.

A company profile may discuss several systems. Capabilities remain attached to the product and conditions named in each source; they do not transfer automatically to related organizations. A verified security relationship has not been attached to this record.

Report an identity issue →
TECHNOLOGY & ACCESS

What it does. Where it fits.

Time-tagging electronics for photon counting and digital-signal measurements.

Who should look closer

Optics laboratories building photon-counting or timing measurements.

QubitWire’s editorial assessment of practical fit.

Commercial instruments and maintained software

Time Tagger models have different precision and throughput; supported APIs include Python, C++, MATLAB, LabVIEW and .NET.

Check the current access route ↗
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

What the sources establish

A 2026 external paper uses Time Tagger Ultra to acquire photon events and conditionally gated counts; a September vendor-hosted LAAS account adds a separate photon-pair application.

What remains unresolved

Timestamp resolution and RMS timing precision differ. Detectors, signal thresholds and synchronization also constrain measurement accuracy.

The next question to watch

Independent comparisons of complete acquisition-chain uncertainty and sustained throughput.

A research question, not a promised milestone.

QubitWire coverage

No published QubitWire stories currently match this organization. The evidence sources below provide the starting point.

Open research questions

Editorial questions for this profile. No reviewed closure decision has been recorded; unanswered questions do not lower the official score.

Open research question

Independent comparisons of complete acquisition-chain uncertainty and sustained throughput.

What evidence would help

A source addressing this question must identify the named system, experiment or deployment, its conditions, measured outcome and remaining limitations. Are performance limits stated under realistic loads and operating conditions?

What would resolve it?

An editorial review must explain which part of this question the evidence resolves. A roadmap or an announcement alone does not close it.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Which named system or service can I use under the documented access route?

What evidence would help

Check the current terms for commercial instruments and maintained software. Identify the system version, eligibility, restrictions and whether the result used hardware or simulation.

What would resolve it?

Current primary documentation must identify the offering, eligible user and access conditions. An unspecified company-level access claim is insufficient.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Are performance limits stated under realistic loads and operating conditions?

What evidence would help

Provide the source location, relevant product or generation, workload, resource constraints and reported uncertainty. Keep measurements, simulations and announced targets distinct.

What would resolve it?

A source reviewer must map the evidence to this exact scope. Missing disclosure remains unknown; it is not technical failure.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence

Questions are drawn from the existing brief and sector reading guide. Research brief reviewed 23 Sept 2026. Following stores a local bookmark; it does not send email alerts or imply a scheduled review.

Since your review

Scope: Swabian Instruments. Reading a page never marks its records reviewed.

Keep a baseline and explicitly mark the evidence you have reviewed. This optional journal stays in this browser.

Existing material records remain available after setup. Routine rechecks and initial entries are excluded from material counts.

From claim to assessment

These are the existing assessment claims and their recorded criterion links. A source link is not an independent replication. New research does not change these published ratings automatically.

Source references in method 1.0 · assessment reviewed 23 Sept 2026
Recorded claim & sourceAssessment linkageProvenance & limits
Source 1

Current catalog distinguishes models and timing precision from digital resolution.

Time Tagger series ↗Published Not recorded
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Delivery

Current commercial models have maintained installation, API and operational documentation.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.
Organization-originated source

Source type: technical. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 23 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 23 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 2

Maintained manual documents installation prerequisites, C++ API, Python/MATLAB/LabVIEW/.NET wrappers and executable acquisition examples.

Time Tagger programming languages ↗Published Not recorded
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Delivery

Current commercial models have maintained installation, API and operational documentation.

Integration

Maintained multi-language wrappers and reusable examples cover acquisition, synchronization, hardware control and postprocessing.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.
Organization-originated source

Source type: technical. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 23 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 23 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 3

External researchers record photon detections with Time Tagger Ultra and analyze conditionally gated counts through Python. Author affiliations include universities, Linq Photonics and Pixel Photonics, not Swabian.

Voltage-programmable photon statistics using a high-extinction thin-film lithium niobate modulator ↗Published 8 May 2026
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Capability

Independent laboratory methods document working photon-event acquisition and conditional counting with the instrument.

Use in practice

A peer-reviewed external experiment explicitly uses the named product for its measurements.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.
External source; collaborators may be involved

Source type: paper. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 23 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 23 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Revision and evidence-family boundaries

Record reference: 9967577730bced69937c9952f3056d13b066d811a176c17081ecf3bd5046b8a3. Read prior recorded revisions.

Repeated coverage can describe the same experiment. The assessment does not contain a reviewed claim-family grouping, so the number of links is never shown as a replication count. Source pages can change independently of this saved assessment; the original source text is not archived here.

CHECK THE ORIGINALS

Sources & evidence

  1. Time Tagger product family ↗Company technical disclosure · Publication date not stated

    Separates model-dependent timing precision from digital resolution.

    Earlier claim used in the assessment

    Current catalog distinguishes models and timing precision from digital resolution.

  2. Time Tagger programming languages ↗Company technical disclosure · Publication date not stated

    Maintained acquisition APIs and examples.

    Earlier claim used in the assessment

    Maintained manual documents installation prerequisites, C++ API, Python/MATLAB/LabVIEW/.NET wrappers and executable acquisition examples.

  3. Voltage-programmable photon statistics ↗External-user peer-reviewed research · 8 May 2026

    External experimental methods identify the instrument and Python analysis.

    Earlier claim used in the assessment

    External researchers record photon detections with Time Tagger Ultra and analyze conditionally gated counts through Python. Author affiliations include universities, Linq Photonics and Pixel Photonics, not Swabian.

  4. Photon-pair generation at LAAS ↗Vendor-hosted customer account · 17 Sept 2026

    Named laboratory use; vendor-hosted customer account, with work still preparing for publication.