Skip to content
RESEARCH · ERROR CORRECTION & MACHINE LEARNING

Google Uses Error Signals to Retune Willow's Quantum Controls

A reinforcement-learning experiment improves stability under injected drift and fine-tunes an already calibrated processor.

Source report
My reading list
BREAKTHROUGH LEDGER · control experiment

Willow retuning was tested under injected drift

Reported
Sivak and colleagues report reinforcement-learning control that reduces variation in logical error rates under deliberately injected drift.
Supported observation
Control steering improves stability 2.4-fold against a fixed policy; adding decoder steering raises this to 3.5-fold. Stability here refers to the standard deviation of logical error rates.
Conditions
The hardware experiment uses short quantum-memory runs on Willow with states prepared again for each shot. The decoder-steering method also estimates logical errors. The drift comparison uses control parameters fixed at their initial calibration.
Not established

This does not demonstrate uninterrupted execution of a long algorithm. The reported decoder steering has real-time scaling limitations; large-code scaling and continuous steering are studied in simulation.

Review: Source and editorial check, 2026-09-26. Attributed primary-source summary; no independent scientific review. Independent replication: not assessed.

Record first published 2026-09-26 · Revision claim-willow-control-steering-r1.

Read the record and revision history →
John Martinis speaks on a conference stage beside a projected presentation.
John Martinis discussing Google’s quantum-computing efforts at IEEE TechIgnite in 2017. Historical research context; the photograph does not establish his involvement in the later Willow retuning experiment.Image: JohnMartinisAtIEEETechIgnite2017.jpg · DanielPenfield · CC BY-SA 4.0Full image credit

Google researchers are using Willow's quantum error-detection events as reinforcement-learning feedback to adjust the processor's control parameters. The peer-reviewed hardware experiment explores whether keeping calibration running during computation could reduce interruptions caused by hardware drift.

The paper reports a 2.4-fold improvement in logical-error-rate stability under injected drift, rising to 3.5-fold with additional decoder steering. In a separate test, fine-tuning an already calibrated processor reduced logical errors by about 20%.

Those results have different conditions: the 3.5-fold figure includes decoder steering whose reported implementation faces real-time scaling limitations, while the large-code results come from simulations. Further tests of sustained operation under natural drift and scalable decoder feedback would clarify how far those gains extend.

Keep your reading trail

Your Updates →

Evidence & context

1 linked source

Peer-reviewed Willow hardware study; large-code scaling assessed in simulation.

How to read the evidence and dates

An announcement records what an organization stated. An experiment reports an observation. A simulation or resource estimate depends on its assumptions. QubitWire’s analysis connects these sources; the labels are not quality scores.

Published is the article’s first QubitWire publication. Updated marks a substantive content change. Sources checked records a review of the underlying evidence. An older paper can support a new explanation, and another press release about the same work is not independent replication.

Read the original · research.google Source report
READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Research stories
  1. Related reading

    QuEra Reports AI-Written Software Recovering Laser Locks in Seconds

    A dedicated testbed recovered in 695 of 700 timed trials, according to QuEra's account of its Claude-assisted control pilot.

    Source report
  2. Related reading

    Quantum Computers Can Make Mistakes While They Wait

    Qubits can accumulate errors while they wait. A surface-code experiment shows why the pauses between operations deserve more attention.

    Published · Sources checked
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Read the latest edition.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read the on-site briefing →

Read selected quantum coverage in the on-site briefing, or register your interest below.