Skip to content
APPLICATIONS · QUANTUM AND AI

Quantum Computing’s Next Test Is Hiding in Rare Earths

The hard part is not another futuristic chip. It is finding chemistry that separates valuable materials more effectively.

Source Published Sources checked
My reading list
An aerial view across the terraced Mountain Pass rare-earth mine in California.
The Mountain Pass rare-earth mine in California. The announced project concerns separation chemistry, not a newly discovered mine, and this is not a partner laboratory.Photo: Mountain Pass rare-earth mine · Ken Lund · CC BY-SA 2.0

A quantum computer could eventually earn its place in industry by helping choose a better chemical. That is the practical question behind a September 17 partnership between USA Rare Earth, Pasqal and Riven Systems. The target is rare-earth separation, not a newly discovered mine.[1]

Rare earths are a family of 17 elements, not one mysterious substance. Their useful properties make them valuable across modern technology, but a mixture of elements is not the same as a supply of separated materials ready for manufacturing. Chemistry is part of the journey from a resource to a usable product.[2]

Rows of labelled containers holding pale green and pink rare-earth salts.
Praseodymium and neodymium salts produced from rare-earth minerals through acid extraction and filtration. This is chemistry context, not material from the announced project.Photo: Praseodymium and neodymium salts · DragoSabry · CC BY-SA 4.0

The partners plan to combine automated laboratory experiments with machine learning. Riven would generate experimental data; Pasqal would compare quantum models with classical models trained on that data. The aim is to identify better extractants, molecules that preferentially bind to particular rare earths. It is a proposed discovery workflow, not a reported quantum advantage.[1]

The simplest analogy is a sorting problem in a crowded room: the useful tool is the one that picks out the right guests without collecting everyone else. In a chemical process, that selectivity has to survive real feedstocks, real equipment and repeated testing. A good score in a model is only the beginning.

A separatory funnel holding two liquid layers above a laboratory bench.
A separatory funnel illustrating liquid-liquid extraction, a broader separation-chemistry technique. It is not equipment from the announced project.Photo: Liquid-liquid extraction · BCanalyst · CC BY-SA 4.0

This is why the classical comparison is so important. Adding quantum hardware does not automatically improve a machine-learning system. A convincing result would need to show a benefit after counting data preparation, computer time and laboratory validation, not just an attractive intermediate metric. Those are the questions a reader should ask when results arrive.

There are no demonstrated processing savings in the announcement. The story is an unusually concrete test of where quantum tools might help: a small part of a larger industrial workflow. The most interesting outcome would not be a headline claiming quantum has solved mining. It would be a better molecule that keeps performing outside the model.

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Applications stories
  1. Related reading

    Quantinuum, NVIDIA and Pfizer Test AI-Generated Chemistry Circuits

    A research workflow trains a transformer to propose molecular state-preparation circuits, with selected circuits tested on Helios hardware.

    Source date
  2. Related reading

    Quantum Computers Could Change What the World Is Made Of

    Chemicals, batteries and pharmaceuticals are among the clearest candidates for early gains. Their breakthroughs could reach you through everyday products.

    Source date
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Start with the preview.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read a briefing preview →

Read selected quantum coverage in the briefing preview, or register your interest below.