Skip to content
APPLICATIONS · EXPLAINER · QUANTUM CURIOSITIES

A Quantum Computer Made Random Numbers. The Wild Part Was Checking Them.

A 56-qubit machine and several supercomputers tackled a surprisingly tricky question: can you trust someone else’s digital coin toss?

Published Sources checked
My reading list
A NIST researcher adjusts refrigeration equipment used to cool single-photon detectors.
NIST single-photon detector research in an archival photograph. Quantum-optics context; this does not show the processor or verification protocol used for the reported random numbers.Image: Photon Detector (5881385271).jpg · National Institute of Standards and Technology · Public domainFull image credit

Suppose a stranger online offers to flip a coin for you. You receive heads or tails, but how do you know they actually flipped anything? A quantum-computing experiment published in March 2025 tackled a much more sophisticated version of that trust problem: producing remotely generated randomness that could be checked.

The team used Quantinuum’s 56- H2-1 computer as an untrusted server. Researchers sent it carefully chosen quantum circuits, essentially small programs, and required quick responses. The answers carried statistical features associated with those circuits, making the task much harder to fake with a conventional computer under the experiment’s assumptions.

NIST physicist Krister Shalm at an optical setup. The 2023 profile describes his research on entanglement, randomness and quantum networks. Context for optical quantum research; this is not the Quantinuum H2-1 experiment.
NIST physicist Krister Shalm at an optical setup. The 2023 profile describes his research on entanglement, randomness and quantum networks. Context for optical quantum research; this is not the Quantinuum H2-1 experiment. Image credit“NIST Quantum Physicist Krister Shalm” — R. Wilson / NIST. NIST public information reuse policy. · https://www.nist.gov/copyrights-disclaimersFull image credit

Then came the expensive checking. As JPMorganChase’s research team explains, four supercomputers helped verify the results, including Oak Ridge’s Frontier. The researchers certified 71,313 bits of entropy: a quantified amount of unpredictability in the output. The achievement concerned evidence about the randomness, not merely producing a string that looked jumbled.

The qualification matters. The paper’s guarantee covered a restricted class of potential adversaries and depended on additional assumptions. This was not an unconditional proof against every possible attacker. Ordinary computers also already obtain randomness from physical sources; the experiment explored how to reduce trust in a remote provider.

That makes randomness an intriguing quantum-computing application, with potential uses wherever people need unpredictable choices they can scrutinize. It also shows how demanding a useful demonstration can be: a quantum machine supplied answers, while substantial classical computing did the checking. A digital coin toss became an unusually serious collaboration.

Keep your reading trail

Your Updates →

Evidence & context

3 linked sources

An explainer of dated research on certified quantum randomness. The 71,313 certified entropy bits are distinct from the total output bits. Classical computers can also obtain randomness from physical entropy sources. Security and advantage claims depend on the experiment’s stated assumptions; contextual NIST photographs show a separate project.

How to read the evidence and dates

An announcement records what an organization stated. An experiment reports an observation. A simulation or resource estimate depends on its assumptions. QubitWire’s analysis connects these sources; the labels are not quality scores.

Published is the article’s first QubitWire publication. Updated marks a substantive content change. Sources checked records a review of the underlying evidence. An older paper can support a new explanation, and another press release about the same work is not independent replication.

Read the original · arxiv.org Sources checked
Additional sources (2)
READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Applications stories
  1. Related reading

    Quantinuum's 55-Qubit Game Makes Non-Classicality Easier to Check

    H2 beat the optimal classical score in an efficiently checked experiment, but this was a device test—not a useful computational speedup.

    Published · Source report
  2. Related reading

    Your Device Can Claim a Location. Can Physics Prove It?

    A quantum experiment combines light signals and strict timing to test where a device actually is. It is not a replacement for GPS.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Read the latest edition.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read the on-site briefing →

Read selected quantum coverage in the on-site briefing, or register your interest below.