Skip to content
RESEARCH · EXPLAINER

Physicists Simulated a False Vacuum. The Universe Is Fine.

A quantum annealer explored how an apparently stable state falls apart. Its “bubbles” stayed inside an engineered model, not our universe.

Sources checked Published
My reading list
Close-up photograph of the patterned surface of a D-Wave 2000-qubit processor.
A D-Wave 2000-qubit processor photographed in 2018. Historical annealing hardware—not the 5,564-qubit machine used in the false-vacuum study. Cropped/resized; no generative edits.Photo: Latest D-Wave 2000 Qubit Processor · Steve Jurvetson · CC BY 2.0

“False vacuum decay” sounds like the opening of a disaster film. In a quantum simulation, it can instead describe a controlled question: how does a system escape a state that looks stable but is not the lowest-energy option? Researchers used a quantum annealer to study that transition. They did not trigger a cosmic catastrophe.[1][2]

The experiment, published in Nature Physics in 2025, used 5,564 superconducting flux qubits. The team examined how regions of a new state form and interact inside an engineered quantum system. Those regions are the bubbles in the story, not physical pockets of a new universe spreading through the laboratory.[1]

The large enclosure of a D-Wave Two installation at NASA’s supercomputing facility.
A D-Wave Two installation at NASA’s Advanced Supercomputing Facility. Historical platform context, not the reported false-vacuum apparatus. Cropped/resized; no generative edits. Adapted image: CC BY-SA 4.0.Photo: D-Wave Two at NASA · Oleg Alexandrov · CC BY-SA 4.0

A useful mental picture is a ball resting in a shallow dip while a deeper valley lies elsewhere. The shallow dip can hold it temporarily. In the quantum model, escape and the growth of new regions follow quantum dynamics, rather than the simple motion of a real ball on a hillside.[1]

The distinction matters because a simulation borrows mathematical structure from the phenomenon it investigates. It does not reproduce every feature of that phenomenon. The device was also an annealer, a specialized quantum machine, not a 5,564- general-purpose computer running an arbitrary program.[1][2]

Rows of Fugaku classical-supercomputer cabinets inside a bright machine room at RIKEN.
RIKEN’s Fugaku classical supercomputer. Computational context only; it is neither a quantum annealer nor an image of the study’s bubble dynamics. Cropped/resized; no generative edits.Photo: Fugaku classical supercomputer at RIKEN · Barsaka2 · CC0 1.0

The payoff is an experimental place to investigate behavior that is difficult to probe directly. The researchers observed bubble dynamics and compared them with an effective model. The dramatic phrase points toward real physics, but the achievement is precise and contained: studying how an engineered quantum system changes state, not discovering how to switch off the universe.[1]

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Research stories
  1. Related reading

    Simulation Rankings Can Mislead Quantum Decoder Selection

    A preprint using Google Willow records separates predicting error rates from choosing error-correction software.

    Source date
  2. Related reading

    Quantum Computers Could Change What the World Is Made Of

    Chemicals, batteries and pharmaceuticals are among the clearest candidates for early gains. Their breakthroughs could reach you through everyday products.

    Source date
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Straight to your inbox.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read a briefing preview →

Selected quantum coverage in a weekly briefing. Read the preview or register your interest.