Skip to content
COMPANY RESEARCH · Error control

QC Design

Plaquette lets hardware teams compare error-correcting codes and architectures under device-specific noise, including leakage and coherent errors that simpler noise models can miss.

Official website ↗
Germany · Research reviewed 7 Sept 2026

Latest record: research brief added · axis ratings unchanged.

Review history 2 records

Record dates use UTC and show when an assessment or clarification was saved. Review dates show the evidence check. Earlier records were recovered from QubitWire’s source history; no earlier score movement is inferred.

Identity & attribution
Organization record
QC Design (organization-qc-design)
Recorded role
Fault-tolerance design and simulation software
Recorded aliases
No aliases recorded in this assessment.
Name and period
No dated name or ownership transition is recorded here. An alias is a search aid, not evidence of a legal ownership relationship.
Product scope
Fault-tolerance design software: hardware noise modeling and QEC simulation

A company profile may discuss several systems. Capabilities remain attached to the product and conditions named in each source; they do not transfer automatically to related organizations. A verified security relationship has not been attached to this record.

Report an identity issue →
TECHNOLOGY & ACCESS

What it does. Where it fits.

Fault-tolerance design software: hardware noise modeling and QEC simulation

Who should look closer

Quantum hardware and QEC researchers deciding which imperfections or architectural choices matter most.

QubitWire’s editorial assessment of practical fit.

Explore Plaquette licensing

Plaquette is a Python software suite. Product documentation directs users to discuss licensing or book a demo; its public technical paper can be read without a software license.

Check the current access route ↗
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

What the sources establish

A July 2026 preprint validates simulation methods against full-state reference calculations for selected noise models. Yaqumo separately confirms adopting Plaquette to evaluate its neutral-atom architecture.

What remains unresolved

Predicted logical error rates depend on the hardware model and simulation assumptions. Software adoption and simulated fault tolerance do not establish a working fault-tolerant quantum computer.

The next question to watch

How closely will the model's predicted logical error rates and resource requirements match measured hardware as systems scale?

A research question, not a promised milestone.

QubitWire coverage

No published QubitWire stories currently match this organization. The evidence sources below provide the starting point.

Open research questions

Editorial questions for this profile. No reviewed closure decision has been recorded; unanswered questions do not lower the official score.

Open research question

How closely will the model's predicted logical error rates and resource requirements match measured hardware as systems scale?

What evidence would help

A source addressing this question must identify the named system, experiment or deployment, its conditions, measured outcome and remaining limitations. What are the physical-qubit, runtime and sampling overheads?

What would resolve it?

An editorial review must explain which part of this question the evidence resolves. A roadmap or an announcement alone does not close it.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Which named system or service can I use under the documented access route?

What evidence would help

Check the current terms for explore plaquette licensing. Identify the system version, eligibility, restrictions and whether the result used hardware or simulation.

What would resolve it?

Current primary documentation must identify the offering, eligible user and access conditions. An unspecified company-level access claim is insufficient.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Was error suppression measured on hardware or predicted by simulation?

What evidence would help

Provide the source location, relevant product or generation, workload, resource constraints and reported uncertainty. Keep measurements, simulations and announced targets distinct.

What would resolve it?

A source reviewer must map the evidence to this exact scope. Missing disclosure remains unknown; it is not technical failure.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence

Questions are drawn from the existing brief and sector reading guide. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. Following stores a local bookmark; it does not send email alerts or imply a scheduled review.

Since your review

Scope: QC Design. Reading a page never marks its records reviewed.

Keep a baseline and explicitly mark the evidence you have reviewed. This optional journal stays in this browser.

Existing material records remain available after setup. Routine rechecks and initial entries are excluded from material counts.

From claim to assessment

These are the existing assessment claims and their recorded criterion links. A source link is not an independent replication. New research does not change these published ratings automatically.

Source references in method 1.0 · assessment reviewed 6 Sept 2026
Recorded claim & sourceAssessment linkageProvenance & limits
Source 1

Documents a licensed Python simulation suite covering code definition, noise modeling, circuit generation, simulation, decoding and analysis, with multiple samplers and quantum-error-correcting code families.

Plaquette ↗Published Not recorded
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Delivery

Plaquette is commercial Python software with a documented licensing route.

Integration

Documented simulator interfaces and hardware-partner adoption establish interoperability.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.
Organization-originated source

Source type: technical. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 6 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 2

Yaqumo confirms adopting Plaquette in its R&D workflow for evaluating neutral-atom architectures under realistic noise; future hardware scale is a goal.

Yaqumo and QC Design Announce Collaboration to Accelerate Fault-Tolerant Neutral-Atom Quantum Computing ↗Published 6 Feb 2026
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Use in practice

Yaqumo and C12 directly confirm adopting Plaquette for architecture work.

Integration

Documented simulator interfaces and hardware-partner adoption establish interoperability.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.
External source; collaborators may be involved

Source type: customer. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 6 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 3

Preprint presents the simulation framework, validates XPauli and near-Clifford samplers against full-state simulation, and demonstrates superconducting leakage, neutral-atom scattering and trapped-ion heating models.

Plaquette: A hardware-aware design platform for fault-tolerant quantum computers ↗Published 9 Jul 2026
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Capability

The public preprint validates simulation methods against reference calculations, not an operating fault-tolerant computer.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.
Organization-originated source

Source type: paper. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 6 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Source 4

C12 confirms adopting Plaquette to benchmark error-correcting codes and refine its carbon-nanotube spin-qubit architecture.

C12 Partners with QC Design and Adopts Plaquette to accelerate towards Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing with Carbon Nanotubes ↗Published 16 Mar 2026
Exact source location

No page, figure or section locator is recorded. Open the source and check the claim in its original context.

Use in practice

Yaqumo and C12 directly confirm adopting Plaquette for architecture work.

Integration

Documented simulator interfaces and hardware-partner adoption establish interoperability.

Published rating inputs remain unchanged.
External source; collaborators may be involved

Source type: customer. Independent replication, experiment date and source-version fingerprint are not separately recorded.

Product and measurement scope: read the named system and conditions in this claim. No normalized product revision is assigned.

Review recorded 6 Sept 2026. Research brief reviewed 7 Sept 2026. These dates do not establish publication or experiment dates.

Report an issue with this claim →
Revision and evidence-family boundaries

Record reference: e628927ccdedad5957639458763138e32c099fba036fda699160bdfe5814a3bf. Read prior recorded revisions.

Repeated coverage can describe the same experiment. The assessment does not contain a reviewed claim-family grouping, so the number of links is never shown as a replication count. Source pages can change independently of this saved assessment; the original source text is not archived here.

CHECK THE ORIGINALS

Sources & evidence

  1. Plaquette ↗Organization-originated source · Publication date not stated

    Documents a licensed Python simulation suite covering code definition, noise modeling, circuit generation, simulation, decoding and analysis, with multiple samplers and quantum-error-correcting code families.

  2. Yaqumo and QC Design Announce Collaboration to Accelerate Fault-Tolerant Neutral-Atom Quantum Computing ↗External source (may be a collaborator) · 6 Feb 2026

    Yaqumo confirms adopting Plaquette in its R&D workflow for evaluating neutral-atom architectures under realistic noise; future hardware scale is a goal.

  3. Plaquette: A hardware-aware design platform for fault-tolerant quantum computers ↗Organization-originated source · 9 Jul 2026

    Preprint presents the simulation framework, validates XPauli and near-Clifford samplers against full-state simulation, and demonstrates superconducting leakage, neutral-atom scattering and trapped-ion heating models.

  4. C12 Partners with QC Design and Adopts Plaquette to accelerate towards Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing with Carbon Nanotubes ↗External source (may be a collaborator) · 16 Mar 2026

    C12 confirms adopting Plaquette to benchmark error-correcting codes and refine its carbon-nanotube spin-qubit architecture.

Keep up with the companies you follow.

Follow companies to find their published coverage here. Email alerts are not enabled.