Loading the evidence record…
Return to the reporting
A dated, source-bounded reading of the original report.
Versioned instance-level submissions with solver details, comparable costs and reproducible results.
Suggest a correction or new source →Initial source-bounded record. No follow-up revision has been published.
A shared benchmark library defines the comparison Reported: IBM’s QOBLIB update describes a shared library of ten optimization problem classes for comparing quantum and classical methods. Supported observation: The August 12 update reports public problem instances, evaluation metrics, classical baselines and a website recording best-known results. Conditions: Results apply to specified problem instances and solver settings. The announcement describes a changing community repository, not a frozen performance ranking. Useful comparisons require the same task, solution-quality target and resource accounting against strong current classical methods. Not established: A benchmark library is not evidence that quantum optimization has achieved practical advantage. This source check does not audit individual submissions or certify their reproducibility. Next evidence: Versioned instance-level submissions with solver details, comparable costs and reproducible results. QOBLIB: tracking progress in quantum optimization · Official benchmark-project update · 2026-08-12 https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/qoblib Source checked 2026-09-26 Revision: claim-qoblib-shared-benchmark-resource-r1 · 2026-09-26 Review: Codex · AI-assisted source and editorial check. Attributed primary-source summary; no independent scientific review. Independent replication: not assessed. Cited revision: https://qubitwire.com/evidence/qoblib-shared-benchmark-resource?revision=claim-qoblib-shared-benchmark-resource-r1 Current corrections: https://qubitwire.com/evidence/qoblib-shared-benchmark-resource