Skip to content

2026 SELECTION

QubitWire 100

100 people recognized for contributions to quantum computing. Unranked and alphabetical by surname.

An unranked collection. Browse by surname or start with an idea.

Browse by topic
Explain these topics
Error correction
Methods that protect encoded quantum information by detecting and correcting certain errors.
Neutral atoms
A hardware approach that stores quantum information in electrically neutral atoms.
Quantum networks
Links that distribute quantum information or entanglement between locations.
Algorithms & complexity
How quantum calculations work and what resources they require.
Foundations
The concepts and physical principles that quantum information builds on.

The 2026 selection3 of 100 people

About algorithms & complexity
Algorithms & complexity
How quantum calculations work and what resources they require.

Jump to surname

B

1 person

Baratz leads D-Wave’s effort to turn quantum hardware into usable computing services, connecting annealing systems, hybrid software and customer-facing product development.

D-Wave

Chief Executive Officer

Read profile
Why included? 2 sources

Baratz’s contribution is organizational and product-focused. D-Wave identifies him as the executive who previously led research and development and product delivery, and as its chief executive since 2020. The company’s computing offering combines annealing hardware, cloud access, development tools and hybrid solvers. This makes his work relevant to the practical question of how researchers and organizations gain access to quantum resources. The profile credits leadership of that development effort without assigning him sole authorship of the hardware or treating company performance claims as independently proven computational advantage.

Quantum hardwareAlgorithms & complexity
Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

F

1 person

A theorist who helped develop adiabatic quantum computation and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, exploring ways quantum dynamics can be used to solve computational problems.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Google

Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics, Emeritus; researcher at Google

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Farhi’s research expands the set of ways to organize quantum computation. Adiabatic computation encodes a problem in the gradual evolution of a physical system, while the quantum approximate optimization algorithm uses alternating operations and adjustable parameters. Both approaches connect mathematical problems with quantum dynamics. Their inclusion here reflects the influence of these frameworks on research; it does not assume that either delivers a general practical advantage over the best classical methods.

Algorithms & complexityQuantum simulation

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

N

1 person

Helped establish quantum annealing as an approach to optimization, using statistical physics to investigate how quantum fluctuations guide systems through difficult energy landscapes.

Institute of Science Tokyo

Professor; Head, Specialized Academy for Quantum Computing

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Nishimori connects quantum computation with the statistical mechanics of complex systems. His work with Tadashi Kadowaki introduced quantum annealing in a transverse-field Ising model, making quantum fluctuations a controllable ingredient in optimization. Later research with Yuya Seki investigated how changing those fluctuations can alter the phase transitions that obstruct an annealing process. These results provide concepts and testable models for an important computing approach. They do not establish a universal speedup over classical optimization methods.

Algorithms & complexityFoundations

Documented work base: Japan

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources
About these checks

Linked sources support selected statements in each profile. Research sources include papers and preprints. A source count is not a ranking or a quality score.

The identification check date relates to the recorded professional description. Individual sources have their own check dates. The fixed 2026 selection stays separate from later profile corrections.

THE EDITORIAL VIEW

Why these people.
Why this field.

Quantum computing is shaped by more than headline breakthroughs. Progress also depends on the people who establish its limits, make its systems more reliable and turn difficult ideas into tools others can use.

The QubitWire 100 recognizes contributions across that work. Each profile explains what is being recognized and connects the account to its supporting evidence.

View the permanent 2026 record