Skip to content

2026 SELECTION

QubitWire 100

100 people recognized for contributions to quantum computing. Unranked and alphabetical by surname.

An unranked collection. Browse by surname or start with an idea.

Browse by topic
Explain these topics
Error correction
Methods that protect encoded quantum information by detecting and correcting certain errors.
Neutral atoms
A hardware approach that stores quantum information in electrically neutral atoms.
Quantum networks
Links that distribute quantum information or entanglement between locations.
Algorithms & complexity
How quantum calculations work and what resources they require.
Foundations
The concepts and physical principles that quantum information builds on.

The 2026 selection7 of 100 people

About neutral atoms
Neutral atoms
A hardware approach that stores quantum information in electrically neutral atoms.

Jump to surname

B

3 people

Bloch develops ultracold-atom quantum simulators, using optical lattices and microscopic imaging to prepare and observe many-body states that are difficult to understand classically.

Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics / LMU Munich

Director, Quantum Many-Body Systems Division; Professor of Experimental Physics

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Bloch’s work makes abstract models of interacting matter experimentally accessible. A landmark optical-lattice experiment observed a controlled transition between a superfluid and a Mott insulator. Later, single-atom imaging exposed the structure and defects of a lattice gas one site at a time. Together, these contributions supplied both a controllable system and a way to read it out. They underpin the use of ultracold atoms as quantum simulators, where the goal is to study a chosen physical model rather than to execute every possible digital quantum algorithm.

Quantum simulationControl & measurement

Documented work base: Germany

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

Bloom founded Atom Computing and coauthored research on long-lived nuclear-spin qubits, connecting precision atomic physics with the development of scalable neutral-atom quantum computers.

Atom Computing

Founder and Chief Executive Officer

Read profile
Why included? 2 sources

Bloom’s contribution combines a specific qubit approach with building an organization to develop it. Atom Computing uses optically trapped neutral atoms, while his coauthored research demonstrates preparation and individual control of nuclear-spin states with long measured coherence. That work addresses the need to retain information while a processor performs operations and measurements. As founder and current chief executive, he also directs the company’s development toward logical qubits and fault tolerance. The profile credits that technical and organizational role without equating a long memory lifetime with a complete error-corrected computer.

Quantum hardwareControl & measurement
Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

Bluvstein develops reconfigurable neutral-atom processors, helping demonstrate coherent transport of entangled atoms and programmable operations on encoded logical qubits in collaborative laboratory experiments.

Caltech / Oratomic

Neutral-atom quantum-computing researcher; Visiting Associate at Caltech

Read profile
Why included? 4 sources

Bluvstein’s research addresses the geometry of a quantum computer: which qubits can interact, how they move, and how information is protected while operations proceed. His coauthored transport experiment used movable atom arrays to create flexible connectivity. A subsequent logical-processor experiment combined that architecture with encoded qubits and error detection. The significance is a concrete route from physical control to logical operations, supported by measured experiments. Harvard’s alumni page lists a Caltech visiting appointment, and Oratomic lists him on its team.

Quantum hardwareError correction

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

G

1 person

Greiner uses ultracold atoms and microscopes that resolve individual atoms to turn collective quantum behavior into questions that can be prepared, measured and tested.

Harvard University

George Vasmer Leverett Professor of Physics

Read profile
Why included? 4 sources

Greiner’s experiments make interacting quantum matter available for controlled study. His work with colleagues in Munich observed a transition between superfluid and Mott-insulating behavior in an optical lattice. His later coauthored quantum-gas-microscope experiment made individual atoms in a lattice directly accessible to imaging. The connection matters: the value of a quantum simulator depends on both preparing a physical model and observing what its constituents do. Harvard identifies his research with strongly correlated many-body systems, ultracold atoms and optical lattices. His laboratory biography also identifies him as a QuEra co-founder and board member. That biographical connection is distinct from evidence about any specific company machine.

Quantum simulationControl & measurement

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

K

1 person

Keesling helped turn programmable Rydberg atom arrays into instruments for quantum simulation, including experiments on large spin systems and the dynamics of quantum phase transitions.

QuEra

Neutral-atom quantum physicist; former Chief Executive Officer, QuEra

Read profile
Why included? 4 sources

Keesling’s scientific contributions show why programmable atom arrays are valuable before they become general-purpose fault-tolerant computers. He coauthored the demonstration of a controllable 51-atom spin simulator, then led the author list of an experimental study of quantum critical dynamics. Those experiments used control over atoms and their interactions to examine how quantum matter changes. His subsequent QuEra leadership links this research platform to industrial development; the former CEO title is explicitly historical.

Quantum simulationControl & measurement
Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

S

1 person

Engineers interactions among laser-cooled atoms to study quantum many-body behavior and create entanglement that can improve the precision of atomic measurements and clocks.

Stanford University

Associate Professor of Physics

Read profile
Why included? 2 sources

Schleier-Smith makes collective quantum behavior experimentally controllable. Her work uses light to mediate interactions between atoms, allowing researchers to tune how information and correlations spread through an atomic ensemble. The same ability to engineer entanglement supports both quantum simulation and improved measurement. She belongs in this directory for research that links those purposes: learning how complex quantum systems behave while developing methods to extract more precise information from them.

Quantum simulationControl & measurement

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

Y

1 person

Uses precise laser control, optical clocks and ultracold matter to investigate quantum behavior, including entanglement-enhanced timekeeping and controllable systems for quantum many-body research.

JILA / National Institute of Standards and Technology

Fellow, JILA and NIST

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Ye’s work shows how precise measurement and quantum control reinforce one another. Optical lattice clocks demand exceptional control over atoms and light; the same tools enable experiments on interactions, entanglement and ultracold molecules. His research therefore contributes to the broader experimental capabilities on which quantum computing and simulation depend. The profile highlights a measured improvement from entanglement alongside a continuing many-body research program, without presenting an atomic clock as a general-purpose quantum processor.

Control & measurementQuantum simulation

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources
About these checks

Linked sources support selected statements in each profile. Research sources include papers and preprints. A source count is not a ranking or a quality score.

The identification check date relates to the recorded professional description. Individual sources have their own check dates. The fixed 2026 selection stays separate from later profile corrections.

THE EDITORIAL VIEW

Why these people.
Why this field.

Quantum computing is shaped by more than headline breakthroughs. Progress also depends on the people who establish its limits, make its systems more reliable and turn difficult ideas into tools others can use.

The QubitWire 100 recognizes contributions across that work. Each profile explains what is being recognized and connects the account to its supporting evidence.

View the permanent 2026 record