Skip to content

2026 SELECTION

QubitWire 100

100 people recognized for contributions to quantum computing. Unranked and alphabetical by surname.

An unranked collection. Browse by surname or start with an idea.

Browse by topic
Explain these topics
Error correction
Methods that protect encoded quantum information by detecting and correcting certain errors.
Neutral atoms
A hardware approach that stores quantum information in electrically neutral atoms.
Quantum networks
Links that distribute quantum information or entanglement between locations.
Algorithms & complexity
How quantum calculations work and what resources they require.
Foundations
The concepts and physical principles that quantum information builds on.

The 2026 selection5 of 100 people

Explain the selected topics
Neutral atoms
A hardware approach that stores quantum information in electrically neutral atoms.
Foundations
The concepts and physical principles that quantum information builds on.

Jump to surname

A

1 person

Alain Aspect and his colleagues switched how they measured pairs of photons while the light was still in flight. Their experiment sharpened an existing test of quantum entanglement.

Institut d’Optique Graduate School / CNRS

Professor, Augustin Fresnel Chair; emeritus CNRS research director

Read profile
Why included? 4 sources

In 1972, Stuart Freedman and John Clauser measured correlations between pairs of photons that violated a Bell inequality. Their measurement settings stayed fixed during each run. A decade later, Aspect, Jean Dalibard and Gérard Roger switched the settings while the photons were travelling. The correlations still exceeded the bound predicted by local hidden-variable models under the assumptions of the test. Later experiments by Aspect’s team used individual photons to study interference and ultracold atoms to see how disorder can stop matter waves from spreading.

FoundationsQuantum simulation

Documented work base: France

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

S

2 people

Develops neutral-atom quantum processors, with research spanning multi-qubit entanglement, quantum algorithms and measurements that preserve the information stored in neighboring atomic qubits.

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Johannes Rydberg Professor of Physics

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Saffman connects the physics of individually controlled atoms to the operations a programmable quantum computer needs. His publications address both entangling several qubits and measuring selected atoms while protecting other qubits. These are distinct engineering steps: preparing useful quantum states does not by itself provide the repeated measurements required for error correction. His inclusion reflects documented experimental contributions to that progression and an active neutral-atom research program at Wisconsin.

Quantum hardwareError correction

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

Engineers interactions among laser-cooled atoms to study quantum many-body behavior and create entanglement that can improve the precision of atomic measurements and clocks.

Stanford University

Associate Professor of Physics

Read profile
Why included? 2 sources

Schleier-Smith makes collective quantum behavior experimentally controllable. Her work uses light to mediate interactions between atoms, allowing researchers to tune how information and correlations spread through an atomic ensemble. The same ability to engineer entanglement supports both quantum simulation and improved measurement. She belongs in this directory for research that links those purposes: learning how complex quantum systems behave while developing methods to extract more precise information from them.

Quantum simulationControl & measurement

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

Y

1 person

Uses precise laser control, optical clocks and ultracold matter to investigate quantum behavior, including entanglement-enhanced timekeeping and controllable systems for quantum many-body research.

JILA / National Institute of Standards and Technology

Fellow, JILA and NIST

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Ye’s work shows how precise measurement and quantum control reinforce one another. Optical lattice clocks demand exceptional control over atoms and light; the same tools enable experiments on interactions, entanglement and ultracold molecules. His research therefore contributes to the broader experimental capabilities on which quantum computing and simulation depend. The profile highlights a measured improvement from entanglement alongside a continuing many-body research program, without presenting an atomic clock as a general-purpose quantum processor.

Control & measurementQuantum simulation

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

Z

1 person

Co-proposed a trapped-ion quantum-computing architecture and controllable ultracold-atom simulations, translating theoretical quantum information into physical systems that experimental laboratories could build and study.

University of Innsbruck

Professor emeritus

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Zoller helped bridge abstract quantum computation and concrete atomic experiments. The Cirac–Zoller proposal explained how trapped ions and laser control could implement quantum logic, while optical-lattice work showed how ultracold atoms could realize tunable many-body models. Both contributions give experiments a physical blueprint rather than only a mathematical target. His current identification is professor emeritus at Innsbruck; his inclusion is grounded in those collaborative architectures and their connection to quantum simulation and controlled quantum dynamics.

Quantum hardwareQuantum simulation

Documented work base: Austria

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources
About these checks

Linked sources support selected statements in each profile. Research sources include papers and preprints. A source count is not a ranking or a quality score.

The identification check date relates to the recorded professional description. Individual sources have their own check dates. The fixed 2026 selection stays separate from later profile corrections.

THE EDITORIAL VIEW

Why these people.
Why this field.

Quantum computing is shaped by more than headline breakthroughs. Progress also depends on the people who establish its limits, make its systems more reliable and turn difficult ideas into tools others can use.

The QubitWire 100 recognizes contributions across that work. Each profile explains what is being recognized and connects the account to its supporting evidence.

View the permanent 2026 record