Skip to content
THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE PROGRESS

QubitWire 100

100 people shaping quantum computing.

September 2026 editionHow we selected the 100

An independent editorial selection, presented alphabetically by surname.

Search names, organizations and contributions. Results stay alphabetical.

The directory4 results

Showing 4 of 100 people

C

1 person

Director, Institute for Quantum Control

Forschungszentrum Jülich · Germany

Calarco develops quantum-control approaches and helps organize European quantum research, connecting the precise manipulation of devices with coordinated programs for building quantum technologies.

Control & measurementPolicy & institutions
Why included?

Calarco’s contribution links technical control research with the institutions that support it. His institute works on methods for steering quantum systems toward desired operations, a problem shared by multiple qubit approaches. He also helped shape the Quantum Manifesto and the European coordination that followed, connecting a research agenda to a broader technology program. This combination matters because useful quantum computing depends on both precise operations and sustained collaboration across groups. The profile identifies those documented activities without crediting him with every result produced by the programs he helped organize.

Explore the contributions and sources

G

1 person

Under Secretary for Science

United States Department of Energy · United States

A science and technology executive whose quantum-sector work spans IBM research leadership and a United States Department of Energy agenda for scientifically useful quantum computing.

Policy & institutionsIndustry & commercialization
Why included?

Gil’s contribution is institutional: directing research organizations and shaping the conditions under which quantum technology is developed. His earlier IBM leadership included the company’s cloud-accessible quantum-computing effort. At the Department of Energy, he has commissioned planning for scientific quantum-computing capability and potential user infrastructure. These responsibilities influence research priorities and access, but neither a corporate title nor a policy roadmap constitutes proof that a proposed machine or performance target has already been achieved.

Explore the contributions and sources

H

1 person

Director, Heijman Consultancy

Heijman Consultancy · Netherlands

Heijman helped organize the Netherlands’ quantum ecosystem, connecting national strategy, research institutions, companies and shared facilities through Quantum Delta NL and House of Quantum.

Policy & institutionsIndustry & commercialization
Why included?

Quantum programs depend on institutions as well as instruments. Heijman’s documented contribution is building connections among research, industry, education and government in the Netherlands. The International Year of Quantum profile credits her with helping initiate and shape the national program; her World Economic Forum biography records cofounding Quantum Delta NL and House of Quantum. Together these activities address the coordination and infrastructure that allow scientific capabilities to become a sustained ecosystem for research and commercialization.

Explore the contributions and sources

M

1 person

Executive Director, Quantum Economic Development Consortium

QED-C / SRI · United States

Connects quantum businesses, research organizations and public agencies through QED-C, bringing experience in technology policy and research partnerships to the practical development of the quantum industry.

Industry & commercializationPolicy & institutions
Why included?

Merzbacher represents the institutional work required to turn scientific capability into a functioning industry. SRI identifies her responsibility for building QED-C and managing the consortium. That role connects organizations whose needs span technology development, suppliers and deployment. Her earlier science-policy work provides relevant context: she oversaw coordination of the National Nanotechnology Initiative at the White House. Her inclusion recognizes ecosystem leadership, with no attribution of individual hardware inventions or standardized technical results.

Explore the contributions and sources