Skip to content

2026 SELECTION

QubitWire 100

100 people recognized for contributions to quantum computing. Unranked and alphabetical by surname.

An unranked collection. Browse by surname or start with an idea.

Browse by topic
Explain these topics
Error correction
Methods that protect encoded quantum information by detecting and correcting certain errors.
Neutral atoms
A hardware approach that stores quantum information in electrically neutral atoms.
Quantum networks
Links that distribute quantum information or entanglement between locations.
Algorithms & complexity
How quantum calculations work and what resources they require.
Foundations
The concepts and physical principles that quantum information builds on.

The 2026 selection6 of 100 people

Jump to surname

H

1 person

Humble connects quantum processors with scientific computing, developing hybrid-system models and helping researchers gain merit-based access to emerging hardware through Oak Ridge’s quantum user program.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Director, Quantum Science Center; Distinguished Scientist, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Read profile
Why included? 2 sources

Humble works at the boundary between quantum devices and the larger computing systems that scientists use. His research models the interfaces, timing and energy demands of hybrid execution rather than considering quantum gates in isolation. As founding director of Oak Ridge’s Quantum Computing User Program, he also helped establish a route for scientific users to access hardware. His current Quantum Science Center leadership continues this focus on integration with high-performance computing and usable research infrastructure.

Industry & commercializationQuantum software

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

K

1 person

Khan helped establish Quantinuum’s integrated hardware-and-software business and supports mathematical research institutions, linking quantum entrepreneurship with the organizational structures that sustain long-term technical development.

Quantinuum / Topos Institute

Founder of Quantinuum; Chair (UK), Topos Institute

Read profile
Why included? 2 sources

Khan’s contribution is entrepreneurial and institutional. Quantinuum identifies him as its founder and former CEO; the business combined Honeywell Quantum Solutions with Cambridge Quantum’s software and applications activities. He later took responsibility for product development as the company’s first chief product officer. His Topos chairmanship adds an institutional connection to mathematics and computation. These are documented leadership roles, and the profile does not assign him personal authorship of the algorithms or hardware produced by the organizations.

Industry & commercializationResearch & education

Documented work base: United Kingdom

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

L

1 person

Laflamme helped establish the theory of quantum error correction, a route to computing with linear optics, and Waterloo’s Institute for Quantum Computing. He died in 2025.

University of Waterloo

Quantum-information physicist; founding executive director of the Institute for Quantum Computing (historical)

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

Laflamme’s enduring contribution combines mathematical foundations with institution building. His work with Emanuel Knill formalized conditions for recovering encoded quantum information after noise. With Knill and Gerard Milburn, he also developed a route to quantum computation using linear optics, photon detection and feedback. At Waterloo he served as the founding executive director of the Institute for Quantum Computing. This historical profile recognizes that continuing scientific legacy while explicitly recording his death in June 2025.

Error correctionFoundations

Documented work base: Canada

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

N

2 people

Helped demonstrate coherent control in an early superconducting qubit and now leads RIKEN’s quantum-computing center, connecting circuit physics with the development of working quantum systems.

RIKEN

Director, RIKEN Center for Quantum Computing

Read profile
Why included? 2 sources

Nakamura’s 1999 experiment made a superconducting electrical device function as a coherently controlled two-level quantum system. That result is a concrete foundation for the superconducting route pursued by many current processors. His present RIKEN role adds a second contribution: directing a center that builds and studies actual quantum computers across multiple approaches. These are distinct forms of influence, experimental demonstration and research organization. The record does not attribute every RIKEN system or performance result to him individually.

Quantum hardwareControl & measurement

Documented work base: Japan

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

Built Google’s quantum research program around superconducting processors, quantum algorithms and error correction, helping connect experimental milestones with a sustained effort toward useful large-scale computing.

Google

Vice President of Engineering; Founder and Lead, Google Quantum AI

Read profile
Why included? 5 sources

Neven’s contribution is the creation and leadership of a research program that joins hardware, algorithms and error correction. His own account dates the founding of Google Quantum AI to 2012. The Willow announcement documents a later milestone: logical error rates falling as the error-correcting code grows. Together these show both institutional continuity and a technically meaningful target. The profile credits the experiments to the research team and distinguishes benchmark or error-correction demonstrations from general commercial usefulness.

Quantum hardwareError correction

Documented work base: United States

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources

W

1 person

A quantum-computing theorist known for mathematical limits on quantum query algorithms and an openly available set of lecture notes spanning algorithms, communication and error correction.

CWI; University of Amsterdam

Senior researcher at CWI and professor of theoretical computer science at the University of Amsterdam

Read profile
Why included? 3 sources

De Wolf helps define how quantum speedups should be assessed. His coauthored polynomial-method paper made it possible to prove important lower bounds on quantum queries, complementing the search for faster algorithms. His lecture notes provide a broad route into the field’s mathematical foundations. Together, the research and teaching emphasize precise models, stated assumptions and meaningful comparisons with classical computation, which are essential when evaluating ambitious claims about quantum advantage.

Algorithms & complexityResearch & education

Documented work base: Netherlands

Identification checked Explore the contributions and sources
About these checks

Linked sources support selected statements in each profile. Research sources include papers and preprints. A source count is not a ranking or a quality score.

The identification check date relates to the recorded professional description. Individual sources have their own check dates. The fixed 2026 selection stays separate from later profile corrections.

THE EDITORIAL VIEW

Why these people.
Why this field.

Quantum computing is shaped by more than headline breakthroughs. Progress also depends on the people who establish its limits, make its systems more reliable and turn difficult ideas into tools others can use.

The QubitWire 100 recognizes contributions across that work. Each profile explains what is being recognized and connects the account to its supporting evidence.

View the permanent 2026 record