Skip to content
RESEARCH · QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION

Logical qubits become entangled on IBM's Phoenix processor

Different experiments probe the ingredients needed for encoded quantum operations.

Published Source report Sources checked
My reading list
Close-up of gold-colored cryostat stages, wiring and tubing inside a dilution refrigerator.
An Oak Ridge National Laboratory dilution refrigerator photographed in January 2020. Archival laboratory context; not the IBM Phoenix processor used in the preprint.Archival context · Photo: Oak Ridge National Laboratory · CC BY 2.0 · CC BY 2.0Full image credit

Researchers report entangling encoded on IBM's Phoenix superconducting processor using lattice surgery, a method for joining and separating error-correcting code patches. Their October 23 preprint describes logical Bell-state fidelities above 93 percent.[1]

The device contains 120 . By excluding underperforming components and using noise-informed decoding, the team reports distance-three and distance-five surface codes with logical error below 1 percent per correction round.[1]

With three logical qubits, it also demonstrates teleportation of selected states and gates, reporting fidelities between 78 and 93 percent.[1]

These measures describe different tasks and should stay separate. The physical processor's 120 qubits do not represent 120 logical qubits, and a memory error per round is not the same quantity as the fidelity of a logical operation.[1]

The study provides experimental evidence for several ingredients of encoded computation. It does not establish that a complete, application-scale fault-tolerant machine has been built.[1]

Keep your reading trail

Your Updates →

Evidence & context

1 linked source

Experimental preprint v1, October 23, 2026; logical operations on IBM Phoenix.

How to read the evidence and dates

An announcement records what an organization stated. An experiment reports an observation. A simulation or resource estimate depends on its assumptions. QubitWire’s analysis connects these sources; the labels are not quality scores.

Published is the article’s first QubitWire publication. Updated marks a substantive content change. Sources checked records a review of the underlying evidence. An older paper can support a new explanation, and another press release about the same work is not independent replication.

Sources

  1. Entangled logical qubits on a superconducting quantum processor

    Experimental preprint submitted October23; source dated 2026-10-23. Reviewed 2026-10-27.

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Research stories
  1. Related reading

    Moving a logical quantum state puts error tolerance to the test

    A surface-code experiment studies when encoded information survives imperfect teleportation. Both code patches sit on the same superconducting processor.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
  2. Related reading

    A cloud-accessible quantum memory improves with code size, with a long-run caveat

    A rectangular surface-code memory improves as one dimension grows. Longer sequences reveal why the duration of the test matters too.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Read the latest edition.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read the on-site briefing →

Read selected quantum coverage in the on-site briefing, or register your interest below.