Skip to content
COMPANY RESEARCH · Computing hardware

Quantum Circuits

D-Wave completed its acquisition of Quantum Circuits in January 2026. The acquired business contributes superconducting dual-rail gate-model development alongside D-Wave’s annealing activities. Quantum Circuits should retain a historical and technical identity in the directory, with current ownership linked to D-Wave rather than a separate public ticker.

Official website ↗
United States · Research reviewed 20 Oct 2026

Initial record: initial research brief recorded.

Review history 1 record

Record dates use UTC and show when an assessment or clarification was saved. Review dates show the evidence check. Earlier records were recovered from QubitWire’s source history; no earlier score movement is inferred.

Identity & attribution
Organization record
Quantum Circuits (organization-050)
Recorded role
Quantum Computing Hardware
Recorded aliases
No aliases recorded in this assessment.
Name and period
No dated name or ownership transition is recorded here. An alias is a search aid, not evidence of a legal ownership relationship.
Product scope
Superconducting dual-rail gate-model development within D-Wave

A company profile may discuss several systems. Capabilities remain attached to the product and conditions named in each source; they do not transfer automatically to related organizations. A verified security relationship has not been attached to this record.

Report an identity issue →

Company evidence and analysis

Dated company evidence, its limits and the next test to follow. These notes do not change a QRank score.

Quantum CircuitsSuperconducting dual-rail gate-model development within D-Wave

Sources reviewed 20 Oct 2026. Event dates remain attached to the original evidence.

D-Wave completed its acquisition of Quantum Circuits in January 2026. The acquired business contributes superconducting dual-rail gate-model development alongside D-Wave’s annealing activities. Quantum Circuits should retain a historical and technical identity in the directory, with current ownership linked to D-Wave rather than a separate public ticker.

An acquisition can change who funds and sells a technology without immediately changing the underlying experiment. A useful profile preserves that continuity: the research record remains attributable to the team and device that produced it, while current product responsibility belongs in the ownership field. The buyer’s existing technology should not overwrite the acquired technology’s modality. In this case, annealing and gate-model development require different task definitions, so a single combined qubit total would obscure rather than explain capability. The strongest next evidence is an integrated product or delivery milestone that identifies which architecture is involved and what the customer can access. Readers should also be able to distinguish acquisition completion from the later completion of a product roadmap. That structure makes the directory more accurate after consolidation and avoids creating the impression that two separately investable businesses still exist.

For a reader evaluating Quantum Circuits, the practical question is how the acquired research becomes a supported product within its current parent’s separate technology portfolio. A useful next evidence check is specific: name the gate-model configuration, product owner, access status and acceptance milestone; preserve original experiment attribution. Combining annealing and gate-model qubit counts obscures the tasks and evidence that each architecture supports. These are proposed tests for judging a later update, not claims that the company has already passed them.

Security status: Acquired operating business; parent security only

Ownership context:
name
D-Wave Quantum Inc.
ticker
QBTS
exchange
Nasdaq
status
acquisition completed 2026-01-20
source id
QI-070
listing status checked at
2026-10-19
historical exchange at acquisition
New York Stock Exchange on 2026-01-20
Facts, comparisons and next evidence

At a glance

  • label
    Quantum role
    value
    Acquired dual-rail gate-model technology
  • label
    Evidence date
    value
    2026-01-20
  • label
    Assessment action
    value
    Evidence enrichment

Dated milestones

  • date
    2026-01-20
    Date scope
    source publication date; unknown if undated
    event
    Acquisition completed
    status
    Published primary evidence; retain the narrower maturity statement
    what it does not establish
    Combining annealing and gate-model qubit counts obscures the tasks and evidence that each architecture supports.

Quantum role

layer
Acquired dual-rail gate-model technology
Question
How the acquired research becomes a supported product within its current parent’s separate technology portfolio.

Questions for comparison

  • Acquired technology versus parent product modality
  • Research attribution and current product responsibility
  • Announced roadmap versus delivered system

Related approaches

  • name
    Alice & Bob
    relationship
    Proposed comparison of relevant dimensions; not a claim of equivalent products or a ranking
    dimensions
    • Acquired technology versus parent product modality
    • Research attribution and current product responsibility
    • Announced roadmap versus delivered system
  • name
    Nord Quantique
    relationship
    Proposed comparison of relevant dimensions; not a claim of equivalent products or a ranking
    dimensions
    • Acquired technology versus parent product modality
    • Research attribution and current product responsibility
    • Announced roadmap versus delivered system

Limits and missing evidence

  • Combining annealing and gate-model qubit counts obscures the tasks and evidence that each architecture supports.
  • Current product/access status
  • Integrated gate-model system acceptance
  • Updated parent segment and operating disclosures

What would change this assessment

trigger
Name the gate-model configuration, product owner, access status and acceptance milestone; preserve original experiment attribution.
Evidence needed
Dated primary technical report, product specification or customer/issuer disclosure directly answering the test.
Test
Identify the configuration, time boundary and measured outcome; retain unsuccessful attempts and stated limitations.
Limit
Combining annealing and gate-model qubit counts obscures the tasks and evidence that each architecture supports.

A starting question

question
Does an acquisition erase the acquired company’s technical record?
answer
No. Historical results remain attached to their authors and systems. The directory should add the current parent relationship, preserve the technology’s identity and avoid presenting a former standalone business as a separate listed investment.
Original sources and scope
  1. D-Wave completes Quantum Circuits acquisition ↗Source dated 20 Jan 2026

    Acquisition completed January 20, 2026. NYSE was the historical venue at that event; current parent venue is Nasdaq, confirmed in QI-070 following QI-071 transfer announcement.

  2. D-Wave reports second quarter 2026 results ↗Source dated 6 Aug 2026

    H1 revenue, bookings and June 30 RPO have different measurement boundaries; confirms Nasdaq QBTS after transfer.

  3. D-Wave announces transfer of stock-exchange listing to Nasdaq ↗Source dated 14 Jul 2026

    Transfer announcement is prospective as issued; later Q2 release confirms current Nasdaq listing.

TECHNOLOGY & ACCESS

What it does. Where it fits.

Superconducting dual-rail gate-model development within D-Wave

Who should look closer

How the acquired research becomes a supported product within its current parent’s separate technology portfolio.

QubitWire’s editorial assessment of practical fit.

Company and product information

See the official source for current contact and product access. No open processor access or completed customer acceptance is inferred.

Check the current access route ↗
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

What the sources establish

D-Wave completed its acquisition of Quantum Circuits in January 2026. The acquired business contributes superconducting dual-rail gate-model development alongside D-Wave’s annealing activities. Quantum Circuits should retain a historical and technical identity in the directory, with current ownership linked to D-Wave rather than a separate public ticker.

What remains unresolved

Combining annealing and gate-model qubit counts obscures the tasks and evidence that each architecture supports; Current product/access status; Integrated gate-model system acceptance; Updated parent segment and operating disclosures.

The next question to watch

Name the gate-model configuration, product owner, access status and acceptance milestone; preserve original experiment attribution.

A research question, not a promised milestone.

QubitWire coverage

Research · Published · Source report · Sources checked

Can a quantum computer calm its own chaos?

An IBM experiment steers deliberately scrambling quantum circuits toward order. Resetting a system and keeping its information safe remain different achievements.

Research · Published · Source report · Sources checked

Shallow Quantum Circuits Lost One Route to Advantage

A deterministic classical algorithm can estimate any chosen output probability for fixed-depth, bounded-fan-in circuits in polynomial time, even with arbitrary connectivity. Sampling remains open.

Research · Published · Source report · Sources checked

Quantum vs. AI: What IBM’s New Theory Actually Shows

A mathematical comparison reveals advantages for quantum circuits on specific tasks, with the language-model architectures and resource limits carefully defined.

Open research questions

Editorial questions for this profile. No reviewed closure decision has been recorded; unanswered questions do not lower the official score.

Open research question

Name the gate-model configuration, product owner, access status and acceptance milestone; preserve original experiment attribution.

What evidence would help

A source addressing this question must identify the named system, experiment or deployment, its conditions, measured outcome and remaining limitations. Does the result report errors, circuit depth and a credible classical baseline?

What would resolve it?

An editorial review must explain which part of this question the evidence resolves. A roadmap or an announcement alone does not close it.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Which named system or service can I use under the documented access route?

What evidence would help

Check the current terms for company and product information. Identify the system version, eligibility, restrictions and whether the result used hardware or simulation.

What would resolve it?

Current primary documentation must identify the offering, eligible user and access conditions. An unspecified company-level access claim is insufficient.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence
Open research question

Can you access the named system today, and under which plan?

What evidence would help

Provide the source location, relevant product or generation, workload, resource constraints and reported uncertainty. Keep measurements, simulations and announced targets distinct.

What would resolve it?

A source reviewer must map the evidence to this exact scope. Missing disclosure remains unknown; it is not technical failure.

No resolved, partial or disputed outcome is asserted without a reviewed transition and its evidence.

Suggest evidence

Questions are drawn from the existing brief and sector reading guide. Research brief reviewed 20 Oct 2026. Following stores a local bookmark; it does not send email alerts or imply a scheduled review.

Since your review

Scope: Quantum Circuits. Reading a page never marks its records reviewed.

Keep a baseline and explicitly mark the evidence you have reviewed. This optional journal stays in this browser.

Existing material records remain available after setup. Routine rechecks and initial entries are excluded from material counts.

A claim-to-assessment source trace is not available for this directory record.

CHECK THE ORIGINALS

Sources & evidence

  1. D-Wave completes Quantum Circuits acquisition ↗Company primary announcement · 20 Jan 2026

    D-Wave completed its acquisition of Quantum Circuits in January 2026. The acquired business contributes superconducting dual-rail gate-model development alongside D-Wave’s annealing activities. Quantum Circuits should retain a historical and technical identity in the directory, with current ownership linked to D-Wave rather than a separate public ticker.

  2. D-Wave reports second quarter 2026 results ↗Issuer financial release · 6 Aug 2026

    D-Wave completed its acquisition of Quantum Circuits in January 2026. The acquired business contributes superconducting dual-rail gate-model development alongside D-Wave’s annealing activities. Quantum Circuits should retain a historical and technical identity in the directory, with current ownership linked to D-Wave rather than a separate public ticker.

  3. D-Wave announces transfer of stock-exchange listing to Nasdaq ↗Issuer listing announcement · 14 Jul 2026

    D-Wave completed its acquisition of Quantum Circuits in January 2026. The acquired business contributes superconducting dual-rail gate-model development alongside D-Wave’s annealing activities. Quantum Circuits should retain a historical and technical identity in the directory, with current ownership linked to D-Wave rather than a separate public ticker.

Keep up with the companies you follow.

Follow companies to find their published coverage here. Email alerts are not enabled.