Skip to content
BUSINESS + POLICY · ANALYSIS

A Quantum Pioneer Quit the Hardware Race. NEC’s Exit Raises a Bigger Question.

The reported withdrawal puts the cost of building quantum machines in focus as rivals make bigger manufacturing bets.

Published Updated Source report Sources checked
My reading list
The tall NEC Super Tower rises against a blue sky in Tokyo.
NEC’s headquarters in Tokyo, photographed in 2006. Archival company context for the hardware-exit report.Image: NEC Super Tower.jpg · KW~jawiki at Japanese Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0Full image credit

One of quantum computing’s earliest pioneers has reportedly stopped building the hardware. Jiji Press reported on September 7 that NEC ended quantum-computer hardware development at the end of March 2026, citing people familiar with the matter. The report linked the decision to the difficult path toward practical use and profitability.[1]

NEC was no latecomer. Its researchers demonstrated coherent control of a in a landmark 1999 Nature paper, helping establish an approach still central to the field. But a scientific head start does not guarantee that a company will keep financing the engineering needed to turn research into a product.[2]

The reported exit is narrower than abandoning quantum technology. Jiji Press says NEC will continue technology development involving quantum mechanics. Meanwhile, Fujitsu’s roadmap targets more than 10,000 superconducting qubits and 250 by fiscal 2030. Logical qubits protect information using multiple ; these remain future targets.[1][3]

Daytime archive photograph of the NEC headquarters building in Tokyo.
NEC’s Tokyo headquarters in a 2012 archive photograph. The reported hardware-development decision took effect in March 2026. Resize preserving source aspect ratio; WebP conversion; no additional crop, extension or scene alteration.Image: NEC Super Tower 2012-02-11.JPG · Asanagi · CC0 1.0Full image credit

That contrast raises a business question. As hardware programs grow, fabrication, cooling, control electronics and error correction all have to improve together. NEC may simply be reallocating resources. Treating its decision as evidence that the entire industry is consolidating would go beyond what one company’s withdrawal establishes.

The useful lesson is about staying power. Quantum’s next phase depends on repeatable machines and customers who can put them to work, alongside better physics. IonQ’s manufacturing push offers a contrasting bet: spend more on the production chain now, then prove that the investment can support a durable hardware business.

Keep your reading trail

Your Updates →

Evidence & context

3 linked sources

NEC’s withdrawal is attributed to Jiji Press reporting, not presented as a directly verified NEC announcement. The 1999 result is peer-reviewed. Fujitsu’s 2030 figures are company targets; consolidation is an analytical question, not an established consequence.

How to read the evidence and dates

An announcement records what an organization stated. An experiment reports an observation. A simulation or resource estimate depends on its assumptions. QubitWire’s analysis connects these sources; the labels are not quality scores.

Published is the article’s first QubitWire publication. Updated marks a substantive content change. Sources checked records a review of the underlying evidence. An older paper can support a new explanation, and another press release about the same work is not independent replication.

For material corrections, check the article’s context note and source trail. A routine formatting or link change does not create a new scientific result.

Sources

  1. Jiji Press: NEC Discontinues Quantum Computer Hardware Development

    September 7, 2026. Reporting attributed to people familiar with the matter; not a public NEC exit announcement.

  2. Nakamura, Pashkin and Tsai: Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box

    Nature, April 29, 1999. DOI: 10.1038/19718.

  3. Fujitsu: Development of a superconducting computer exceeding 10,000 qubits

    August 1, 2025. Fiscal-2030 targets are forward-looking, not delivered capability.

READ NEXT

Continue exploring

All Business + Policy stories
  1. Related reading

    IonQ Says Its Next Quantum Computer Can Be Built by the Hundreds

    Superion 256 turns the spotlight from qubit counts to production costs, factory capacity and the deliveries promised for 2027.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
  2. Related reading

    Fujitsu Is Testing Quantum Software on Atoms Held by Light

    A new hardware test asks whether a different kind of quantum computer can benefit from the same software ideas.

    Published · Source report · Sources checked
THE QUANTUM BRIEFING

A clearer signal.
Read the latest edition.

A little perspective on a fast-moving field.

Read the on-site briefing →

Read selected quantum coverage in the on-site briefing, or register your interest below.